Thomas Bice

20 papers receiving 368 citations

Peers

Thomas Bice
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Health Information Management 117
  • Health Informatics 14
  • Family Practice 22
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 47
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 7
Replace Stephanie Kennebeck with:
Stephanie Kennebeck United States
Esteban Gershanik United States
Brent R. King United States
Jodi Simon United States
Naveen Muthu United States
Carl T. Berdahl United States
Elise Russo United States
Alvin D. Jeffery United States
Bashar Alyousef United States
Alan Wolff Australia
Thomas Bice relative to Stephanie Kennebeck United States Stephanie Kennebeck's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Stephanie Kennebeck · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Bice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Bice's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Bice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Bice more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Bice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Bice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Bice. The network helps show where Thomas Bice may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Bice, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Bice Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Bice links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201891
2 202063
3 201936
4 201935
5 201332
6 201530
7 201120
8 201817
9 201916
10 20209
11 20208
12 20216
13
How "regular" is the "regular source of medical care"?
19735
14 20223
15 20213
16 19732
17
Evaluation of Physicians' Electronic Health Records Experience Using Actual and Perceived Measures.
20222
18 20181
19 20191
20 20221

About Thomas Bice

Thomas Bice is a scholar working on Health Information Management, Health Informatics, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Family Practice, having authored 22 papers that have together received 381 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electronic Health Records Systems (10 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (7 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (4 papers), Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring (4 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (4 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (3 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (3 papers) and Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (117 citations), Health Informatics (14 citations), Family Practice (22 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (47 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (7 citations). Thomas Bice has collaborated with scholars based in United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Shannon S. Carson, Saif Khairat, Cameron Coleman, Shannon S. Carson, Debbie Travers, Christopher E. Cox, Judith E. Nelson, Saif Khairat, Ross Koppel and Blair Wendlandt. Their work appears in journals such as Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, CHEST Journal, JAMA Network Open, Health Information Management Journal and PEDIATRICS.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026