Thomas Bark

693 citations
16 papers · 631 indexed · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Bark

15 papers receiving 624 citations

Peers

Thomas Bark
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Inorganic Chemistry 284
  • Organic Chemistry 370
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 103
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 209
  • Spectroscopy 108
Replace Kornelia Zeckert with:
Kornelia Zeckert Germany
R.-D. Schnebeck Germany
Y.K. Kryschenko United States
C.H. Chan United Kingdom
Diane R. Smith Switzerland
A. De Cian France
C.L. Painting United Kingdom
Riccardo F. Carina Switzerland
Alexander S. Ovsyannikov Russia
Georg Seeber United Kingdom
Thomas Bark relative to Kornelia Zeckert Germany Kornelia Zeckert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Kornelia Zeckert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Bark

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Bark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Bark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Bark more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Bark

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Bark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Bark. The network helps show where Thomas Bark may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Bark, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Bark Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Bark links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 20173
2 201142
3 200553
4 200429
5 20042
6 200221
7 200131
8 2001105
9 200049
10 200029
11 200022
12 20004
13 1999185
14 199942
15 199813
16 19731

About Thomas Bark

Thomas Bark is a scholar working on Inorganic Chemistry, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Organic Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Spectroscopy, having authored 16 papers that have together received 631 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetism in coordination complexes (6 papers), Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes (5 papers), Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (4 papers), Metal complexes synthesis and properties (3 papers), Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry (3 papers), Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (2 papers), Surface Chemistry and Catalysis (2 papers) and Crystallography and molecular interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Inorganic Chemistry (284 citations), Organic Chemistry (370 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (103 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (209 citations) and Spectroscopy (108 citations). Thomas Bark has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Alex von Zelewsky, Olimpia Mamula, Gérald Bernardinelli, H. Stoeckli‐Evans, Randolph P. Thummel, A. Neels, Alexander von Zelewsky, Philippe Renaud, Cyril Ollivier and Jacques A. Delaire. Their work appears in journals such as Chemistry - A European Journal, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Carbon, Chemical Communications and Journal of the Chemical Society Perkin Transactions 1.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026