Thomas Acton

5.5k citations
110 papers · 3.6k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 31

Thomas Acton

108 papers receiving 3.6k citations

Hit Papers

Principles for designing ideal protein structures4102012202620162021100200300400

Peers

Thomas Acton
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • Biological Psychiatry 103
  • Molecular Biology 2.7k
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 281
  • Materials Chemistry 754
  • Biochemistry 114
Replace F. Forouhar with:
F. Forouhar United States
J.B. Bonanno United States
Katsuhide Yutani Japan
Kwang Yeon Hwang South Korea
G B Cox Australia
Marcelo M. Santoro Brazil
Wulf Blankenfeldt Germany
Florence Pojer Switzerland
Constance J. Jeffery United States
C.A. Bingman United States
Thomas Acton relative to F. Forouhar United States F. Forouhar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
F. Forouhar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Acton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Acton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Acton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Acton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Acton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Acton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Acton. The network helps show where Thomas Acton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Acton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Acton Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Acton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20234
2 201351
3 20138
4
Principles for designing ideal protein structuresbreakdown →
2012410
5 20121
6 20126
7 20126
8 20128
9 20111
10 20117
11 20107
12 20092
13 20074
14 200731
15 2005232
16 20047
17 2004130
18 200336
19 200025
20 199752

About Thomas Acton

Thomas Acton is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Materials Chemistry, Biological Psychiatry, Genetics and Biochemistry, having authored 110 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Enzyme Structure and Function (43 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (35 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (29 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (18 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (17 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (10 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (7 papers) and RNA modifications and cancer (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (103 citations), Molecular Biology (2.7k citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (281 citations), Materials Chemistry (754 citations) and Biochemistry (114 citations). Thomas Acton has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include G.T. Montelione, Rong Xiao, David Baker, Gaohua Liu, Liang Tong, F. Forouhar, Nobuyasu Koga, Rie Koga, J.F. Hunt and J.K. Everett. Their work appears in journals such as Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics, Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Biochemistry and Protein Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026