Thomas A. Powe

20 papers receiving 342 citations

Peers

Thomas A. Powe
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 131
  • Small Animals 90
  • Reproductive Medicine 83
  • Animal Science and Zoology 97
  • Equine 10
Replace B.W. Gray with:
B.W. Gray United States
G. K. Dhaliwal United Kingdom
Romildo Romualdo Weiss Brazil
W. Duane Mickelsen United States
Dwight F. Wolfe United States
E. C. Mather United States
Mark W. Atkinson United States
Kennedy Pc
Luis R. Padilla United States
Karen Wolfsdorf United States
Thomas A. Powe relative to B.W. Gray United States B.W. Gray's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
B.W. Gray · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas A. Powe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas A. Powe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas A. Powe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas A. Powe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas A. Powe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas A. Powe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas A. Powe. The network helps show where Thomas A. Powe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas A. Powe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas A. Powe Line = papers co-authored together Thomas A. Powe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 199897
2 198638
3 198937
4
Feeding broiler litter to beef cattle
199430
5 201625
6
Effectiveness of two commercial infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis vaccines.
199022
7
Enteric coccidial infections and coccidiosis in swine
199221
8 199116
9 198716
10 198814
11 199713
12
Mesothelioma in cattle: eight cases (1970-1988)
199113
13 199312
14 198911
15 19849
16 19917
17 19924
18 19812
19 19832
20
Naturally occurring neurologic disease in calves fed Claviceps sp. infected dallis grass hay and pasture
19921

About Thomas A. Powe

Thomas A. Powe is a scholar working on Small Animals, Animal Science and Zoology, Immunology, Infectious Diseases and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 20 papers that have together received 390 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Nutrition and Physiology (3 papers), Veterinary medicine and infectious diseases (3 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (3 papers), Coccidia and coccidiosis research (2 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (2 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (2 papers), Virology and Viral Diseases (2 papers) and Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (131 citations), Small Animals (90 citations), Reproductive Medicine (83 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (97 citations) and Equine (10 citations). Thomas A. Powe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Vietnam and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Robert Hudson, Robert L. Carson, D.F. Wolfe, M.G. Riddell, Thomas Lee Bailey, B.W. Gray, Robert E. Cartee, Timothy R. Boosinger, James C. Wright and David G. Pugh. Their work appears in journals such as Theriogenology, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, American Journal of Veterinary Research, Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation and Veterinary Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact