Thomas A. Chvapil

412 total citations
12 papers, 313 citations indexed

About

Thomas A. Chvapil is a scholar working on Surgery, Rehabilitation and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas A. Chvapil has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 313 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Surgery, 4 papers in Rehabilitation and 2 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Thomas A. Chvapil's work include Surgical Sutures and Adhesives (5 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (4 papers) and Hemostasis and retained surgical items (2 papers). Thomas A. Chvapil is often cited by papers focused on Surgical Sutures and Adhesives (5 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (4 papers) and Hemostasis and retained surgical items (2 papers). Thomas A. Chvapil collaborates with scholars based in United States. Thomas A. Chvapil's co-authors include Miloš Chvapil, J.A. Owen, Donald P. Speer, William D. Rappaport, Glenn C. Hunter, Hana Holubec, Ari Halldorsson, Scott D. Lick, Robert J. Allen and Donald B. Witzke and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fertility and Sterility and Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Thomas A. Chvapil

12 papers receiving 294 citations

Peers

Thomas A. Chvapil
J.A. Clarke United Kingdom
Leonard D. Kurtz United States
Martin C. Robson United States
Cynthia A. Fleck United States
Eileen Nolan United States
Patrick Gillespie United Kingdom
Janet A. Welch United States
Ian Mackie United Kingdom
J.Burton Douglass Saudi Arabia
J.A. Clarke United Kingdom
Thomas A. Chvapil
Citations per year, relative to Thomas A. Chvapil Thomas A. Chvapil (= 1×) peers J.A. Clarke

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas A. Chvapil

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas A. Chvapil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas A. Chvapil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas A. Chvapil more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas A. Chvapil

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas A. Chvapil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas A. Chvapil. The network helps show where Thomas A. Chvapil may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas A. Chvapil

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas A. Chvapil. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas A. Chvapil based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas A. Chvapil. Thomas A. Chvapil is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
1.
Chvapil, Miloš, et al.. (1993). Collagen fibers as a temporary scaffold for replacement of ACL in goats. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 27(3). 313–325. 56 indexed citations
2.
Hunter, Glenn C., William D. Rappaport, Donald B. Witzke, et al.. (1991). Effects of electrocautery on midline laparotomy wound infection. The American Journal of Surgery. 162(6). 620–623. 32 indexed citations
3.
Rappaport, William D., Glenn C. Hunter, Robert J. Allen, et al.. (1990). Effect of electrocautery on wound healing in midline laparotomy incisions. The American Journal of Surgery. 160(6). 618–620. 65 indexed citations
4.
Hameroff, Stuart R., et al.. (1988). STM imaging of molecular collagen and phospholipid membranes. Journal of Microscopy. 152(2). 557–566. 13 indexed citations
5.
Chvapil, Miloš, et al.. (1988). An optimal morphometric method for quantitating wound epithelization. Journal of Surgical Research. 44(3). 266–276. 17 indexed citations
6.
Chvapil, Miloš, Thomas A. Chvapil, & J.A. Owen. (1986). Reaction of various skin wounds in the rat to collagen sponge dressing. Journal of Surgical Research. 41(4). 410–418. 25 indexed citations
7.
Chvapil, Miloš, Donald P. Speer, J.A. Owen, & Thomas A. Chvapil. (1984). Identification of the Depth of Burn Injury by Collagen Stainability. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 73(3). 438–441. 73 indexed citations
8.
Chvapil, Miloš, Thomas A. Chvapil, & Cleamond D. Eskelson. (1978). Studies on vaginal malodor. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 225(2). 77–89. 5 indexed citations
9.
Chvapil, Miloš, et al.. (1978). Ultrastructure of the Vaginal Tissue of Rabbits Treated With Collagen Sponge Alone and Medicated with Zinc and Copper Salts and Copper Wire. Fertility and Sterility. 30(4). 461–469. 4 indexed citations
10.
Chvapil, Miloš, et al.. (1978). Reaction of vaginal tissue of rabbit and of cheek pouch of hamster to inserted collagen sponges treated with either zinc or copper. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 130(1). 63–70. 12 indexed citations
11.
Eskelson, Cleamond D., Miloš Chvapil, Sai Y. Chang, & Thomas A. Chvapil. (1978). Identification of ejaculate derived propylamine found in collagen sponge contraceptives. Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 5(3). 238–242. 3 indexed citations
12.
Chvapil, Miloš, et al.. (1977). Laboratory and clinical testing of an intravaginal contraceptive collagen sponge. Contraception. 15(6). 693–703. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026