Theo Wobbes
- Oncology top 1%
- Surgery top 2%
- Cancer Research top 1%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 1%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 1%
- Co-authors
- C. BoetesBram P. BuunkJelle O. BarentszRobbert SandermanRoeline G. KuijerTheo J. M. RuersPeter BultWilbert H.M. Peters
- Topics
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (19 papers)Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (18 papers)Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Theo Wobbes
129 papers receiving 4.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 145
- Oncology 1.7k
- Surgery 1.3k
- Cancer Research 1.2k
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.1k
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 975
Countries citing papers authored by Theo Wobbes
This map shows the geographic impact of Theo Wobbes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Theo Wobbes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theo Wobbes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Theo Wobbes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Theo Wobbes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Theo Wobbes. The network helps show where Theo Wobbes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Theo Wobbes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Theo Wobbes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Theo Wobbes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Theo Wobbes. Theo Wobbes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30 | |
| 2 | 74 | |
| 3 | 47 | |
| 4 | Diagnostic performance of FDG-PET and CT in the upstaging of melanoma patients with lymph node metastases and the clinical consequences | 1 |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 46 | |
| 7 | 73 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 90 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 40 | |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | 401 | |
| 15 | 32 | |
| 16 | Malignant eccrine poroma with lymph node metastasis followed by multiple basal cell carcinomas in a young female patient. | 3 |
| 17 | 0 | |
| 18 | 100 | |
| 19 | 64 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Theo Wobbes
Theo Wobbes is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Oncology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 132 papers that have together received 5.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (19 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (18 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (1.2k citations), Oncology (1.7k citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.1k citations). Theo Wobbes has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include C. Boetes, Bram P. Buunk, Jelle O. Barentsz, Robbert Sanderman, Roeline G. Kuijer, Theo J. M. Ruers, Peter Bult, Wilbert H.M. Peters, Thijs Hendriks and Roland Holland. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Gastroenterology and JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.