Theo van Walsum

6.3k citations
183 papers · 3.8k indexed · h-index 34

Theo van Walsum

177 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Peers

Theo van Walsum
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.8k
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 1.4k
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 140
  • Biomedical Engineering 1.3k
  • Radiation 240
Replace Hans-Peter Meinzer with:
Hans-Peter Meinzer Germany
Raj Shekhar United States
Robert Rohling Canada
Luc Soler France
Julia A. Schnabel United Kingdom
Andriy Myronenko United States
Kensaku Mori Japan
Bernhard Kainz United Kingdom
David J. Hawkes United Kingdom
J. Michael Fitzpatrick United States
Theo van Walsum relative to Hans-Peter Meinzer Germany Hans-Peter Meinzer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Hans-Peter Meinzer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Theo van Walsum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Theo van Walsum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Theo van Walsum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theo van Walsum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Theo van Walsum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Theo van Walsum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Theo van Walsum. The network helps show where Theo van Walsum may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Theo van Walsum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Theo van Walsum Line = papers co-authored together Theo van Walsum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 20245
3 20241
4 20234
5 20235
6 20225
7 20226
8 202211
9 202210
10 202125
11 20215
12 202016
13
Deep learning-based retinal vessel segmentation with cross-modal evaluation
20203
14 202031
15
Multi modal and multi scale retinal imaging with and without adaptive optics for clinical settings
20201
16 20166
17 201533
18 201444
19 201144
20 20108

About Theo van Walsum

Theo van Walsum is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, having authored 183 papers that have together received 3.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (57 papers), Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (46 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (32 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (29 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (24 papers), Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (20 papers), Medical Imaging and Analysis (20 papers) and Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.8k citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (1.4k citations) and Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (140 citations). Theo van Walsum has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Vietnam. Frequent co-authors include Wiro J. Niessen, Michiel Schaap, Coert Metz, Stefan Klein, Everine B. van de Kraats, Max A. Viergever, Nóra Baka, Adriaan Moelker, Aad van der Lugt and Romhild M. Hoogeveen. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Spine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026