Thea van de Mortel

1.7k total citations
78 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Thea van de Mortel is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Infectious Diseases. According to data from OpenAlex, Thea van de Mortel has authored 78 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in General Health Professions, 22 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 15 papers in Infectious Diseases. Recurrent topics in Thea van de Mortel's work include Innovations in Medical Education (17 papers), Infection Control in Healthcare (15 papers) and Nursing education and management (15 papers). Thea van de Mortel is often cited by papers focused on Innovations in Medical Education (17 papers), Infection Control in Healthcare (15 papers) and Nursing education and management (15 papers). Thea van de Mortel collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Arab Emirates. Thea van de Mortel's co-authors include William A. Buttemer, Margherita Murgo, Γεώργιος Πετρίκκος, Eleni Apostolopoulou, Judith Needham, A.M.A. Nasirudeen, Leodoro J. Labrague, Denise M. McEnroe–Petitte, Julita Sansoni and Stephen Kermode and has published in prestigious journals such as Oecologia, Journal of Advanced Nursing and BMC Health Services Research.

In The Last Decade

Thea van de Mortel

73 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thea van de Mortel Australia 20 400 240 207 152 146 78 1.1k
Victor Santana Santos Brazil 25 767 1.9× 227 0.9× 218 1.1× 70 0.5× 62 0.4× 122 1.7k
Sarah Alsubaie Saudi Arabia 23 861 2.2× 378 1.6× 121 0.6× 127 0.8× 87 0.6× 62 2.1k
Rebecca M. Coulborn United States 12 390 1.0× 170 0.7× 109 0.5× 89 0.6× 306 2.1× 20 1.2k
Elucir Gir Brazil 25 1.4k 3.5× 766 3.2× 329 1.6× 184 1.2× 110 0.8× 309 2.4k
Clara Sue Ross United States 6 543 1.4× 193 0.8× 160 0.8× 291 1.9× 84 0.6× 9 1.3k
E.A. Jenner United Kingdom 9 272 0.7× 85 0.4× 36 0.2× 156 1.0× 87 0.6× 14 582
Álvaro Francisco Lopes de Sousa Brazil 19 452 1.1× 315 1.3× 128 0.6× 225 1.5× 44 0.3× 162 1.1k
Marianna Ofner Canada 14 530 1.3× 194 0.8× 144 0.7× 107 0.7× 364 2.5× 28 1.4k
Danilo Cereda Italy 18 521 1.3× 106 0.4× 217 1.0× 32 0.2× 103 0.7× 85 1.3k
Silvia Cocchio Italy 18 310 0.8× 181 0.8× 127 0.6× 74 0.5× 49 0.3× 94 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Thea van de Mortel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thea van de Mortel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thea van de Mortel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thea van de Mortel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thea van de Mortel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thea van de Mortel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thea van de Mortel. The network helps show where Thea van de Mortel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thea van de Mortel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thea van de Mortel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thea van de Mortel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thea van de Mortel. Thea van de Mortel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Mortel, Thea van de, et al.. (2025). Surgical bundle sustainability in caesarean section births: An integrative review. Infection Disease & Health. 31(1). 100381–100381.
3.
Mortel, Thea van de, et al.. (2024). The influence of near-peer teaching on undergraduate health professional students' self-efficacy beliefs: A systematic integrative review. Nurse Education Today. 143. 106377–106377. 8 indexed citations
5.
West, Roianne, Vicki Saunders, Letitia Del Fabbro, et al.. (2022). Indigenous-led First Peoples health interprofessional and simulation-based learning innovations: mixed methods study of nursing academics’ experience of working in partnership. Contemporary Nurse. 58(1). 43–57. 4 indexed citations
6.
Shaban, Ramon Z., et al.. (2019). Hand hygiene beliefs and behaviours about alcohol-based hand rub use: Questionnaire development, piloting and validation. Infection Disease & Health. 25(1). 43–49. 6 indexed citations
7.
Mortel, Thea van de, et al.. (2017). Student nurses' perceptions of clinical placements in Australian Prison Health Services: A mixed methods study. Nurse Education in Practice. 24. 55–61. 16 indexed citations
8.
Mortel, Thea van de, et al.. (2016). Supporting near-peer teaching in general practice: a national survey. BMC Medical Education. 16(1). 143–143. 17 indexed citations
9.
Mortel, Thea van de, et al.. (2013). Vertically integrated shared learning models in general practice: a qualitative study. BMC Family Practice. 14(1). 144–144. 10 indexed citations
10.
Mortel, Thea van de, Eleni Apostolopoulou, Γεώργιος Πετρίκκος, et al.. (2012). The hand hygiene knowledge, beliefs, practices and education of healthcare students. ePublications@SCU (Southern Cross University). 27(3). 161–167. 3 indexed citations
11.
Mortel, Thea van de, et al.. (2012). Quality assurance and quality enhancement of the nursing curriculum – happy marriage or recipe for divorce?. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice. 2(3). 6 indexed citations
12.
Mortel, Thea van de, et al.. (2011). Ritualistic preoperative fasting: is it still occurring and what can we do about it?. ePublications@SCU (Southern Cross University). 21(1). 14–19. 7 indexed citations
13.
Mortel, Thea van de. (2009). Development of a questionnaire to assess health care students’ hand hygiene knowledge, beliefs and practices. Australian journal of advanced nursing. 26(3). 37 indexed citations
14.
Mortel, Thea van de & Margherita Murgo. (2006). An examination of covert observation and solution audit as tools to measure the success of hand hygiene interventions. American Journal of Infection Control. 34(3). 95–99. 61 indexed citations
15.
Mortel, Thea van de. (2002). HEALTH CARE WORKERS’ KNOWLEDGE OF HEPATITIS C AND ATTITUDES TOWARDS PATIENTS WITH HEPATITIS C: A PILOT STUDY. Australian journal of advanced nursing. 20(1). 7 indexed citations
16.
Mortel, Thea van de. (2002). Health for all Australians. Contemporary Nurse. 12(2). 169–175. 14 indexed citations
17.
Mortel, Thea van de, et al.. (2000). Maximising handwashing rates in the critical care unit through yearly performance feedback. Australian Critical Care. 13(3). 91–95. 33 indexed citations
18.
Mortel, Thea van de. (2000). States of health: health and illness in Australia (3rd ed). Contemporary Nurse. 9(1). 51–61. 2 indexed citations
19.
Mortel, Thea van de & Ross L. Goldingay. (1998). Population assessment of the endangered Green and Golden Bell Frog Litoria aurea at Port Kembla, New South Wales. Australian Zoologist. 30(4). 398–404. 25 indexed citations
20.
Mortel, Thea van de & William A. Buttemer. (1996). Are Litoria aurea eggs more sensitive to ultraviolet-B radiation than eggs of sympatric L. peronii or L. dentata ?. Australian Zoologist. 30(2). 150–157. 32 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026