Thea A. Wilkins
- Plant Science top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Biotechnology top 2%
- Endocrinology top 2%
- Biomaterials top 10%
- Co-authors
- Natasha V. RaikhelAlaaddin Bulak ArpatSebastian Y. BednarekS. C. TiwariLeandro Lopes LoguercioJ. R. GannawayLawrence B. SmartMasayoshi Maeshima
- Topics
- Research in Cotton Cultivation (26 papers)Plant Virus Research Studies (10 papers)Plant Molecular Biology Research (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndiaEgypt
In The Last Decade
Thea A. Wilkins
44 papers receiving 3.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Plant Science 2.7k
- Molecular Biology 1.6k
- Biotechnology 239
- Endocrinology 238
- Biomaterials 146
Countries citing papers authored by Thea A. Wilkins
This map shows the geographic impact of Thea A. Wilkins's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thea A. Wilkins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thea A. Wilkins more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thea A. Wilkins
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thea A. Wilkins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thea A. Wilkins. The network helps show where Thea A. Wilkins may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thea A. Wilkins
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thea A. Wilkins. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thea A. Wilkins based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thea A. Wilkins. Thea A. Wilkins is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 33 | |
| 2 | 61 | |
| 3 | 57 | |
| 4 | 19 | |
| 5 | 27 | |
| 6 | 44 | |
| 7 | 157 | |
| 8 | Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and regeneration of cotton | 44 |
| 9 | 212 | |
| 10 | 26 | |
| 11 | 28 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 51 | |
| 14 | A Modified Hot Borate Method Significantly Enhances the Yield of High-Quality RNA from Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)breakdown → | 874 |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 25 | |
| 18 | 28 | |
| 19 | 29 | |
| 20 | 17 |
About Thea A. Wilkins
Thea A. Wilkins is a scholar working on Plant Science, Biotechnology and Endocrinology, having authored 44 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Research in Cotton Cultivation (26 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (10 papers) and Plant Molecular Biology Research (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (2.7k citations), Endocrinology (238 citations) and Horticulture (31 citations). Thea A. Wilkins has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Natasha V. Raikhel, Alaaddin Bulak Arpat, Sebastian Y. Bednarek, S. C. Tiwari, Leandro Lopes Loguercio, J. R. Gannaway, Lawrence B. Smart, Masayoshi Maeshima, Jonathan F. Wendel and James E. Dombrowski. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The Plant Cell and PLANT PHYSIOLOGY.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.