Tessa Langley

1.9k total citations
88 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Tessa Langley is a scholar working on Physiology, Applied Psychology and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Tessa Langley has authored 88 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 47 papers in Physiology, 21 papers in Applied Psychology and 15 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Tessa Langley's work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (47 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (21 papers) and Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (13 papers). Tessa Langley is often cited by papers focused on Smoking Behavior and Cessation (47 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (21 papers) and Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (13 papers). Tessa Langley collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Egypt. Tessa Langley's co-authors include Sarah Lewis, John Britton, Lisa Szatkowski, Ann McNeill, Linda Bauld, Anna Gilmore, Michelle Sims, Ilze Bogdanovica, Ben Young and Kate Hinds and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Tessa Langley

83 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Tessa Langley United Kingdom 18 640 296 251 217 178 88 1.2k
Rachael L Murray United Kingdom 22 891 1.4× 305 1.0× 210 0.8× 295 1.4× 175 1.0× 107 1.6k
Christopher M. Anderson United States 19 1.0k 1.6× 363 1.2× 330 1.3× 379 1.7× 214 1.2× 52 1.7k
Sarah D. Kowitt United States 20 551 0.9× 289 1.0× 253 1.0× 313 1.4× 120 0.7× 76 1.3k
Minal Patel United States 20 674 1.1× 361 1.2× 159 0.6× 162 0.7× 79 0.4× 68 1.1k
Mary Hrywna United States 21 969 1.5× 482 1.6× 200 0.8× 146 0.7× 76 0.4× 72 1.4k
Leah M. Ranney United States 22 1.1k 1.7× 482 1.6× 425 1.7× 216 1.0× 89 0.5× 90 1.7k
Taghrid Asfar United States 23 1.3k 2.0× 391 1.3× 253 1.0× 302 1.4× 85 0.5× 84 1.9k
Brett R. Loomis United States 21 962 1.5× 452 1.5× 159 0.6× 168 0.8× 80 0.4× 39 1.3k
Ryan David Kennedy United States 17 704 1.1× 288 1.0× 184 0.7× 112 0.5× 63 0.4× 106 1.1k
Deirdre Lawrence United States 17 757 1.2× 297 1.0× 131 0.5× 260 1.2× 118 0.7× 27 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Tessa Langley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tessa Langley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tessa Langley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tessa Langley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tessa Langley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tessa Langley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tessa Langley. The network helps show where Tessa Langley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tessa Langley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tessa Langley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tessa Langley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tessa Langley. Tessa Langley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Langley, Tessa, et al.. (2024). Attitudes and Exposure to Illicit Tobacco in England, 2022. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 26(11). 1591–1594.
3.
Langley, Tessa, et al.. (2024). Developing a Vape Shop-Based Smoking Cessation Intervention: A Delphi Study. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 26(10). 1362–1369. 2 indexed citations
4.
Stewart‐Evans, James, et al.. (2024). Health net-outcome objectives and approaches for spatial planning and development: a scoping review protocol. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 22(11). 2394–2403.
5.
Paskins, Zoé, Anastasios Bastounis, Sarah Davis, et al.. (2023). Research priorities regarding the use of bisphosphonates for osteoporosis: a UK priority setting exercise. Osteoporosis International. 34(10). 1711–1718. 1 indexed citations
6.
Langley, Tessa, et al.. (2023). How Should a Vape Shop-Based Smoking Cessation Intervention Be Delivered? A Qualitative Study. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 26(10). 1355–1361. 1 indexed citations
7.
Bishop, Simon, Melanie Narayanasamy, Zoé Paskins, et al.. (2023). Clinicians’ views of prescribing oral and intravenous bisphosphonates for osteoporosis: a qualitative study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 24(1). 770–770. 5 indexed citations
8.
Sahota, Opinder, Melanie Narayanasamy, Anastasios Bastounis, et al.. (2023). Bisphosphonate alternative regimens for the prevention of osteoporotic fragility fractures: BLAST-OFF, a mixed-methods study. Health Technology Assessment. 28(21). 1–169. 2 indexed citations
9.
Bastounis, Anastasios, Tessa Langley, Sarah Davis, et al.. (2022). Comparing medication adherence in patients receiving bisphosphonates for preventing fragility fractures: a comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis. Osteoporosis International. 33(6). 1223–1233. 7 indexed citations
10.
Murray, Rachael L, et al.. (2022). Healthcare Professionals’ Knowledge, Attitudes and Counselling Practice Regarding Prevention of Secondhand Smoke Exposure Among Pregnant Women/Children in Assiut, Egypt. International Journal of Public Health. 67. 1605073–1605073. 4 indexed citations
11.
Young, Ben, Andrew Fogarty, Rob Skelly, et al.. (2020). Patients' attitudes towards cost feedback to doctors to prevent unnecessary testing: a qualitative focus group study. Public Health. 185. 338–340. 4 indexed citations
13.
Langley, Tessa, et al.. (2020). Developing logic models to inform public health policy outcome evaluation: an example from tobacco control. Journal of Public Health. 43(3). 639–646. 8 indexed citations
14.
Varona-Pérez, Patricia, Sarah Bridges, Ramón Suárez Medina, et al.. (2019). What is the association between price and economic activity with cigarette consumption in Cuba from 1980 to 2014?. Public Health. 173. 126–129. 1 indexed citations
15.
Young, Ben, Jo Cranwell, Andrew Fogarty, et al.. (2019). Evaluation of the impact of a brief educational message on clinicians’ awareness of risks of ionising-radiation exposure in imaging investigations: a pilot pre-post intervention study. BMC Health Services Research. 19(1). 841–841. 9 indexed citations
16.
Lewis, Sarah, et al.. (2018). Vape shops: who uses them and what do they do?. BMC Public Health. 18(1). 541–541. 17 indexed citations
17.
Stead, Martine, Kathryn Angus, Tessa Langley, et al.. (2018). Mass Media for Public Health Messages: Reviews of the Evidence. Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling). 1 indexed citations
18.
Ahankari, Anand, Puja Myles, Sachin Atre, et al.. (2017). A qualitative study exploring factors influencing clinical decision-making for influenza-like illness in Solapur city, Maharashtra, India. Anthropology and Medicine. 26(1). 65–86. 1 indexed citations
19.
Lewis, Sarah, Mario Sims, Sarah Richardson, et al.. (2015). The effectiveness of tobacco control television advertisements in increasing the prevalence of smoke-free homes. BMC Public Health. 15(1). 869–869. 14 indexed citations
20.
Thaler, Kylie, et al.. (2009). Bach Flower Remedies for psychological problems and pain: a systematic review. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 9(1). 16–16. 32 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026