Terry F. Strong

756 total citations
21 papers, 525 citations indexed

About

Terry F. Strong is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Terry F. Strong has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 525 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 16 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 6 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Terry F. Strong's work include Forest ecology and management (14 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (7 papers) and Forest Management and Policy (7 papers). Terry F. Strong is often cited by papers focused on Forest ecology and management (14 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (7 papers) and Forest Management and Policy (7 papers). Terry F. Strong collaborates with scholars based in United States, India and Canada. Terry F. Strong's co-authors include Christel C. Kern, Peter B. Reich, Rebecca Montgomery, Anthony W. D’Amato, Edward A. Hansen, Brian J. Palik, John C. Zasada, J. Zavitkovski, Ron M. Teclaw and David F. Grigal and has published in prestigious journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Biomass and Bioenergy and Canadian Journal of Forest Research.

In The Last Decade

Terry F. Strong

19 papers receiving 477 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Terry F. Strong United States 11 419 346 188 85 49 21 525
G. B. MacDonald Canada 12 372 0.9× 324 0.9× 191 1.0× 57 0.7× 37 0.8× 24 475
A.A. Alm United States 9 301 0.7× 195 0.6× 124 0.7× 99 1.2× 54 1.1× 26 445
Duncan S. Wilson United States 13 341 0.8× 351 1.0× 151 0.8× 124 1.5× 21 0.4× 21 513
Nathan Peterson Canada 7 232 0.6× 234 0.7× 91 0.5× 89 1.0× 23 0.5× 14 379
H. C. Thorpe Canada 9 326 0.8× 286 0.8× 151 0.8× 63 0.7× 30 0.6× 12 441
Lorne Bedford Canada 14 473 1.1× 310 0.9× 192 1.0× 114 1.3× 22 0.4× 25 595
Ray A. Newbold United States 8 272 0.6× 201 0.6× 70 0.4× 42 0.5× 37 0.8× 16 324
John M. Goodburn United States 9 295 0.7× 290 0.8× 231 1.2× 117 1.4× 25 0.5× 11 469
Eric Agestam Sweden 12 342 0.8× 206 0.6× 146 0.8× 47 0.6× 19 0.4× 13 400
Jean L. Heineman Canada 13 360 0.9× 310 0.9× 100 0.5× 58 0.7× 17 0.3× 28 433

Countries citing papers authored by Terry F. Strong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Terry F. Strong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Terry F. Strong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Terry F. Strong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Terry F. Strong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Terry F. Strong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Terry F. Strong. The network helps show where Terry F. Strong may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Terry F. Strong

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Terry F. Strong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Terry F. Strong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Terry F. Strong. Terry F. Strong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
D’Amato, Anthony W., et al.. (2016). Analysis of stand basal area development of thinned and unthinned Acer rubrum forests in the upper Great Lakes region, USA. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 46(5). 645–655. 4 indexed citations
2.
Kern, Christel C., Rebecca Montgomery, Peter B. Reich, & Terry F. Strong. (2014). Harvest-Created Canopy Gaps Increase Species and Functional Trait Diversity of the Forest Ground-Layer Community. Forest Science. 60(2). 335–344. 50 indexed citations
3.
Kern, Christel C., Anthony W. D’Amato, & Terry F. Strong. (2013). Diversifying the composition and structure of managed, late-successional forests with harvest gaps: What is the optimal gap size?. Forest Ecology and Management. 304. 110–120. 65 indexed citations
4.
Kern, Christel C., Rebecca Montgomery, Peter B. Reich, & Terry F. Strong. (2012). Canopy gap size influences niche partitioning of the ground-layer plant community in a northern temperate forest. Journal of Plant Ecology. 6(1). 101–112. 65 indexed citations
5.
Kern, Christel C., Peter B. Reich, Rebecca Montgomery, & Terry F. Strong. (2011). Do deer and shrubs override canopy gap size effects on growth and survival of yellow birch, northern red oak, eastern white pine, and eastern hemlock seedlings?. Forest Ecology and Management. 267. 134–143. 92 indexed citations
6.
Strong, Terry F., et al.. (2006). Effects of Crown Release on Growth and Quality of Even-Aged Red Maple Stands. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry. 23(4). 229–233. 3 indexed citations
7.
Strong, Terry F.. (2005). Early stand development in a red oak-paper birch stand regenerated through the shelterwood system in northern Wisconsin. 262. 1 indexed citations
8.
Strong, Terry F., et al.. (2000). Effects of residual stand density on growth and volume production in even-aged red maple stands. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 30(3). 372–378. 9 indexed citations
9.
Strong, Terry F., et al.. (2000). Effects of residual stand density on growth and volume production in even-aged red maple stands. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 30(3). 372–378. 9 indexed citations
10.
Strong, Terry F., et al.. (1998). Forested soil carbon storage in landscapes of the Northern Great Lakes region. 335–350. 6 indexed citations
11.
Strong, Terry F., Ron M. Teclaw, & John C. Zasada. (1997). Monitoring the effects of partial cutting and gap size on microclimate and vegetation responses in northern hardwood forests in Wisconsin. 238. 11 indexed citations
12.
Strong, Terry F., et al.. (1995). Forty years of alternative management practices in second-growth, pole-size northern hardwoods. I. Tree quality deveSopment. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 25(7). 1173–1179. 25 indexed citations
13.
Strong, Terry F., et al.. (1995). Forty years of alternative management practices in second-growth, pole-size northern hardwoods» IL Economic evaluation. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 25(7). 1180–1188. 22 indexed citations
14.
Strong, Terry F. & Edward A. Hansen. (1993). Hybrid poplar spacing/productivity relations in short rotation intensive culture plantations. Biomass and Bioenergy. 4(4). 255–261. 35 indexed citations
15.
Strong, Terry F., et al.. (1992). Economic and tree diversity trade-offs in managed northern hardwoods. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 22(11). 1807–1813. 62 indexed citations
16.
Strong, Terry F. & David F. Grigal. (1987). Site and seed source influence jack pine yields in the Lake States. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 17(7). 705–711. 3 indexed citations
17.
Strong, Terry F., et al.. (1983). Effect of harvesting season on hybrid poplar coppicing. 91. 6 indexed citations
18.
Zavitkovski, J. & Terry F. Strong. (1982). How to grow and use hybrid poplar firewood.. 1 indexed citations
19.
Zavitkovski, J., et al.. (1981). Biomass production of several jack pine provenances at three Lake States locations. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 11(2). 441–447. 10 indexed citations
20.
Strong, Terry F. & J. Zavitkovski. (1978). Morphology of jack pine and tamarack needles in dense stands.. 153. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026