Terri Woo

587 total citations
8 papers, 394 citations indexed

About

Terri Woo is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Oncology and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Terri Woo has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 394 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Molecular Biology, 4 papers in Oncology and 2 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Terri Woo's work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (2 papers), Renal and related cancers (2 papers) and Genital Health and Disease (2 papers). Terri Woo is often cited by papers focused on Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (2 papers), Renal and related cancers (2 papers) and Genital Health and Disease (2 papers). Terri Woo collaborates with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Saudi Arabia. Terri Woo's co-authors include Christopher P. Crum, Álvaro P. Pinto, Sandro Santagata, Nicolas F. Schlecht, Edmund S. Cibas, Fabíola Medeiros, Karishma Mehra, Alexander Miron, Nicolas M. Monte and Yosuf Yassin and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Investigation, PLoS ONE and The Journal of Pathology.

In The Last Decade

Terri Woo

7 papers receiving 388 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Terri Woo United States	7	135	129	128	114	85	8	394
Laura López-Vicente Spain	4	265 2.0×	166 1.3×	62 0.5×	69 0.6×	88 1.0×	4	480
P.G. Jayaprakash India	13	170 1.3×	130 1.0×	174 1.4×	53 0.5×	70 0.8×	22	459
Çiğdem Himmetoğlu Türkiye	11	163 1.2×	109 0.8×	44 0.3×	73 0.6×	35 0.4×	17	407
Hans‐Georg Strauß Germany	11	146 1.1×	64 0.5×	157 1.2×	171 1.5×	103 1.2×	24	486
Christian Lussier Canada	10	206 1.5×	122 0.9×	39 0.3×	96 0.8×	65 0.8×	16	408
Marlene Zuraek United States	10	109 0.8×	313 2.4×	208 1.6×	98 0.9×	69 0.8×	16	576
Violeta R. McGaughy United States	7	129 1.0×	148 1.1×	52 0.4×	57 0.5×	33 0.4×	8	450
Michał Kunc Poland	14	109 0.8×	205 1.6×	55 0.4×	135 1.2×	67 0.8×	51	431
Iman Zandieh Canada	6	140 1.0×	239 1.9×	66 0.5×	59 0.5×	60 0.7×	8	384
Josena K. Stephen United States	15	341 2.5×	109 0.8×	86 0.7×	127 1.1×	108 1.3×	31	597

Countries citing papers authored by Terri Woo

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Terri Woo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Terri Woo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Terri Woo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Terri Woo

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Terri Woo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Terri Woo. The network helps show where Terri Woo may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Terri Woo

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Terri Woo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Terri Woo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Terri Woo. Terri Woo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Coy, Shannon, Jong Suk Lee, Sabrina Chan, et al.. (2023). Systematic characterization of antibody–drug conjugate targets in central nervous system tumors. Neuro-Oncology. 26(3). 458–472. 17 indexed citations

2.

Richardson, Andrea L., Bin Wang, Tan A. Ince, et al.. (2020). Taxonomy of breast cancer based on normal cell phenotype predicts outcome. UNC Libraries.

3.

Coy, Shannon, Ziming Du, Shu‐Hsien Sheu, et al.. (2016). Distinct patterns of primary and motile cilia in Rathke's cleft cysts and craniopharyngioma subtypes. Modern Pathology. 29(12). 1446–1459. 16 indexed citations

4.

Abedalthagafi, Malak, Michael P. Wu, Parker Merrill, et al.. (2015). Decreased FOXJ1 expression and its ciliogenesis programme in aggressive ependymoma and choroid plexus tumours. The Journal of Pathology. 238(4). 584–597. 27 indexed citations

5.

Santagata, Sandro, Bin Wang, Terri Woo, et al.. (2014). Taxonomy of breast cancer based on normal cell phenotype predicts outcome. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 124(2). 859–870. 141 indexed citations

6.

Merritt, Melissa A., Stefan Bentink, Matthew Schwede, et al.. (2013). Gene Expression Signature of Normal Cell-of-Origin Predicts Ovarian Tumor Outcomes. PLoS ONE. 8(11). e80314–e80314. 36 indexed citations

7.

Pinto, Álvaro P., Alexander Miron, Yosuf Yassin, et al.. (2010). Differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia contains Tp53 mutations and is genetically linked to vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. Modern Pathology. 23(3). 404–412. 93 indexed citations

8.

Pinto, Álvaro P., Nicolas F. Schlecht, Terri Woo, Christopher P. Crum, & Edmund S. Cibas. (2008). Biomarker (ProEx C, p16INK4A, and MiB-1) distinction of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion from its mimics. Modern Pathology. 21(9). 1067–1074. 64 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact