Terje Laskemoen
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 1%
- Ecology top 5%
- Genetics top 5%
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jan T. LifjeldOddmund KlevenFrode FossøyRaleigh J. RobertsonArild JohnsenGeir RudolfsenMelissah RoweTomáš Albrecht
- Topics
- Animal Behavior and Reproduction (36 papers)Plant and animal studies (21 papers)Avian ecology and behavior (20 papers)
- Partner nations
- NorwayCanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Terje Laskemoen
39 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 934
- Ecology 603
- Genetics 390
- Reproductive Medicine 113
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 103
Countries citing papers authored by Terje Laskemoen
This map shows the geographic impact of Terje Laskemoen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Terje Laskemoen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Terje Laskemoen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Terje Laskemoen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Terje Laskemoen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Terje Laskemoen. The network helps show where Terje Laskemoen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Terje Laskemoen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Terje Laskemoen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Terje Laskemoen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Terje Laskemoen. Terje Laskemoen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 62 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 27 | |
| 13 | 76 | |
| 14 | 118 | |
| 15 | 119 | |
| 16 | 26 | |
| 17 | 34 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 35 | |
| 20 | Intraspecific variation in sperm length in two passerine species, the Bluethroat Luscinia svecica and the Willow Warbler Phylloscopus trochilus | 38 |
About Terje Laskemoen
Terje Laskemoen is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology and Physiology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Behavior and Reproduction (36 papers), Plant and animal studies (21 papers) and Avian ecology and behavior (20 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (934 citations), Ecology (603 citations) and Developmental Biology (39 citations). Terje Laskemoen has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jan T. Lifjeld, Oddmund Kleven, Frode Fossøy, Raleigh J. Robertson, Arild Johnsen, Geir Rudolfsen, Melissah Rowe, Tomáš Albrecht, Emily R. A. Cramer and Lars Erik Johannessen. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Evolution and Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.