Te−I Weng

1.5k citations
65 papers · 1.1k · h-index 22

Impact in

  • Toxicology top 2%
    • Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
    • Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
    • Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds

Papers in

Te−I Weng

64 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Te−I Weng
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Toxicology 90
  • Pharmacology 108
  • Emergency Medicine 111
  • Rehabilitation 69
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 52
Replace Osman Evliyaoğlu with:
Osman Evliyaoğlu Türkiye
M. Ehrnebo Sweden
Nigar Yılmaz Türkiye
Hong Jin China
Mevlüt Sait Keleş Türkiye
Faruk Turğut Türkiye
Stylianos Kapiotis Austria
Tülay Köken Türkiye
Thomas J. Preston United States
W. J. Tilstone United Kingdom
Te−I Weng relative to Osman Evliyaoğlu Türkiye Osman Evliyaoğlu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Osman Evliyaoğlu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Te−I Weng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Te−I Weng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Te−I Weng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Te−I Weng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Te−I Weng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Te−I Weng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Te−I Weng. The network helps show where Te−I Weng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Te−I Weng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Te−I Weng Line = papers co-authored together Te−I Weng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201785
2 200867
3 201155
4 201255
5
Association of psychological distress with psychological factors in rescue workers within two months after a major earthquake.
200254
6 201749
7 200540
8 201038
9 201336
10 200433
11 201932
12 201232
13 200431
14 201729
15 200527
16 200426
17 201226
18 201825
19 201124
20 201222

About Te−I Weng

Te−I Weng is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Emergency Medicine, Toxicology, Surgery and Pharmacology, having authored 65 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (13 papers), Poisoning and overdose treatments (10 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (6 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (5 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (4 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (4 papers), Magnolia and Illicium research (4 papers) and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (90 citations), Pharmacology (108 citations), Emergency Medicine (111 citations), Rehabilitation (69 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (52 citations). Te−I Weng has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Shing‐Hwa Liu, Cheng‐Chung Fang, Wen‐Jone Chen, Chih‐Kang Chiang, Kuo‐Cheng Lan, Wei‐Tien Chang, Ching‐Chia Wang, Keh‐Sung Tsai, Meei‐Ling Sheu and Rong‐Sen Yang. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, Resuscitation, Archives of Toxicology, Clinical Toxicology and Antioxidants.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact