Ted Christopher

553 citations
23 papers · 390 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Ted Christopher

17 papers receiving 353 citations

Peers

Ted Christopher
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 274
  • Biomedical Engineering 288
  • Mechanics of Materials 107
  • History and Philosophy of Science 9
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 8
Replace P.L.M.J. van Neer with:
P.L.M.J. van Neer Netherlands
P. VanBaren United States
Chihng‐Tsung Liauh Taiwan
Christophe Barrière France
J. Borsboom Netherlands
Guillaume Férin France
S. Krishnan United States
J. W. Valvano United States
Liansheng Xu China
K.B. Ocheltree United States
Ted Christopher relative to P.L.M.J. van Neer Netherlands P.L.M.J. van Neer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
P.L.M.J. van Neer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ted Christopher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ted Christopher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ted Christopher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ted Christopher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ted Christopher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ted Christopher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ted Christopher. The network helps show where Ted Christopher may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Ted Christopher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ted Christopher Line = papers co-authored together Ted Christopher links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997171
2 199858
3 199642
4 199430
5 199925
6 199916
7 199911
8 20179
9 20058
10 20205
11 20224
12 20223
13
Modeling Acoustic Field Propagation for Medical Devices
19932
14 20111
15 19961
16 20111
17 20201
18 20221
19 20181
20 20240

About Ted Christopher

Ted Christopher is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, History and Philosophy of Science, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Social Psychology and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 23 papers that have together received 390 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolution and Science Education (6 papers), Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (6 papers), Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography (5 papers), Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (4 papers), Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (3 papers), Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation (3 papers), Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena (2 papers) and Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (274 citations), Biomedical Engineering (288 citations), Mechanics of Materials (107 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (9 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (8 citations). Ted Christopher has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include E. L. Carstensen, Sheryl M. Gracewski, Diane Dalecki and Brian Nolan. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Religions and Journal of Computational Acoustics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact