Teal R. Riley
- Geophysics top 0.5%
- Atmospheric Science top 1%
- Artificial Intelligence top 1%
- Paleontology top 1%
- Earth-Surface Processes top 2%
- Co-authors
- Philip T. LeatR. J. PankhurstC. Mark FanningS. P. KelleyIan MillarBryan StoreyMichael J. FlowerdewMichael L. Curtis
- Topics
- Geological and Geochemical Analysis (78 papers)Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (59 papers)Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (32 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaGeochimica et Cosmochimica ActaRemote Sensing of Environment
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSwedenUnited States
In The Last Decade
Teal R. Riley
92 papers receiving 3.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Geophysics 2.6k
- Atmospheric Science 1.4k
- Artificial Intelligence 1.1k
- Paleontology 838
- Earth-Surface Processes 318
Countries citing papers authored by Teal R. Riley
This map shows the geographic impact of Teal R. Riley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Teal R. Riley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Teal R. Riley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Teal R. Riley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Teal R. Riley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Teal R. Riley. The network helps show where Teal R. Riley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Teal R. Riley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Teal R. Riley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Teal R. Riley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Teal R. Riley. Teal R. Riley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | 21 | |
| 17 | 44 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 70 | |
| 20 | Extrusive carbonatite from the Quaternary Rockeskyll Complex, West Eifel, Germany | 21 |
About Teal R. Riley
Teal R. Riley is a scholar working on Geophysics, Paleontology and Atmospheric Science, having authored 97 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geological and Geochemical Analysis (78 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (59 papers) and Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (32 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (2.6k citations), Paleontology (838 citations) and Atmospheric Science (1.4k citations). Teal R. Riley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include Philip T. Leat, R. J. Pankhurst, C. Mark Fanning, S. P. Kelley, Ian Millar, Bryan Storey, Michael J. Flowerdew, Michael L. Curtis, Martin J. Whitehouse and Chris Harris. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta and Remote Sensing of Environment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.