Tanya Duke
- Small Animals top 0.5%
- Surgery top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Equine top 0.5%
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 2%
- Co-authors
- Audrey RemediosPeter H. CribbJohn L. PattersonAlbert HeymanNigel CaulkettPeter J. WalshDavid WalkerHugh G.G. Townsend
- Topics
- Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia (29 papers)Anesthesia and Pain Management (18 papers)Veterinary Equine Medical Research (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Tanya Duke
52 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Small Animals 658
- Surgery 541
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 272
- Equine 251
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 200
Countries citing papers authored by Tanya Duke
This map shows the geographic impact of Tanya Duke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tanya Duke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tanya Duke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tanya Duke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tanya Duke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tanya Duke. The network helps show where Tanya Duke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tanya Duke
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tanya Duke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tanya Duke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tanya Duke. Tanya Duke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 39 | |
| 2 | 26 | |
| 3 | 67 | |
| 4 | 22 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 32 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 67 | |
| 14 | 23 | |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | 47 | |
| 17 | Handbook of Veterinary Anesthesia, 2nd ed | 8 |
| 18 | A comparison of systolic blood pressure measurement obtained using a pulse oximeter, and direct systolic pressure measurement in anesthetized sows. | 6 |
| 19 | Veterinary Anaesthesia, 9th Ed | 22 |
| 20 | 38 |
About Tanya Duke
Tanya Duke is a scholar working on Equine, Small Animals and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 54 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia (29 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (18 papers) and Veterinary Equine Medical Research (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (251 citations), Small Animals (658 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (200 citations). Tanya Duke has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Audrey Remedios, Peter H. Cribb, John L. Patterson, Albert Heyman, Nigel Caulkett, Peter J. Walsh, David Walker, Hugh G.G. Townsend, Christine Egger and James Ferguson. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of Clinical Investigation and Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.