Tannaze Tinati
- General Health Professions top 0.5%
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes 3
- Health Policy Implementation Science 2
- Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations 2
- Applied Psychology top 1%
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 2%
-
- Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet 6
- Speech and Hearing top 2%
-
- Breastfeeding Practices and Influences 3
-
- Obesity and Health Practices 3
-
- Vitamin D Research Studies 2
-
- Birth, Development, and Health 2
- Co-authors
- Janis BairdMary BarkerAlicia O’CathainLyndal BondSuzanne AudreyWendy HardemanChris BonellLaurence Moore
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaAustralia
In The Last Decade
Tannaze Tinati
17 papers receiving 4.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 149
- General Health Professions 2.2k
- Applied Psychology 356
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 195
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.0k
- Speech and Hearing 215
Countries citing papers authored by Tannaze Tinati
This map shows the geographic impact of Tannaze Tinati's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tannaze Tinati with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tannaze Tinati more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tannaze Tinati
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tannaze Tinati. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tannaze Tinati. The network helps show where Tannaze Tinati may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tannaze Tinati, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 16 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 34 | |
| 4 | Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidancebreakdown → | 2015 | 3747 |
| 5 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 36 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 108 | |
| 9 | Process Evaluation of Complex Interventions Guidance: UK Medical Research Council (MRC) Guidance | 2014 | 60 |
| 10 | Flow diagram of study selection | 2014 | 0 |
| 11 | 2014 | 259 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 111 | |
| 13 | MATERNAL VITAMIN D STATUS IN PREGNANCY AND OFFSPRING BONE HEALTH: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS | 2013 | 1 |
| 14 | 2012 | 26 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 31 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 24 | |
| 17 | 2012 | 47 | |
| 18 | 2011 | 13 |
About Tannaze Tinati
Tannaze Tinati is a scholar working on Pharmacy, General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 18 papers that have together received 4.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (6 papers), Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (3 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (3 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (3 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers), Vitamin D Research Studies (2 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (2 papers) and Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (2.2k citations), Applied Psychology (356 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (195 citations). Tannaze Tinati has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Janis Baird, Mary Barker, Alicia O’Cathain, Lyndal Bond, Suzanne Audrey, Wendy Hardeman, Chris Bonell, Laurence Moore, Daniel Wight and Gary F. Moore. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ, Osteoporosis International and BMJ Open.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.