Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Health Information Technology: An Updated Systematic Review With a Focus on Meaningful Use
2014345 citationsSpencer S. Jones, Robert S. Rudin et al.Annals of Internal Medicineprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Tanja Perry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tanja Perry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tanja Perry more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tanja Perry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tanja Perry. The network helps show where Tanja Perry may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tanja Perry
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tanja Perry.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tanja Perry based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Tanja Perry. Tanja Perry is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Jones, Spencer S., Robert S. Rudin, Tanja Perry, & Paul G Shekelle. (2014). Health Information Technology: An Updated Systematic Review With a Focus on Meaningful Use. Annals of Internal Medicine. 160(1). 48–54.345 indexed citations breakdown →
Shekelle, Paul G, Margaret Maglione, Jill Luoto, Breanne Johnsen, & Tanja Perry. (2013). Table B.9, NHMRC Evidence Hierarchy: designations of ‘levels of evidence’ according to type of research question (including explanatory notes).2 indexed citations
9.
Shekelle, Paul G, Margaret Maglione, Jill Luoto, Breanne Johnsen, & Tanja Perry. (2013). Global Health Evidence Evaluation Framework [Internet].
10.
Shekelle, Paul G, Margaret Maglione, Jill Luoto, Breanne Johnsen, & Tanja Perry. (2013). Global Health Evidence Evaluation Framework.3 indexed citations
11.
Maglione, Margaret, Melinda M. Gibbons, Masha J. Livhits, et al.. (2013). Bariatric Surgery and Nonsurgical Therapy in Adults With Metabolic Conditions and a Body Mass Index of 30.0 to 34.9 kg/m2.9 indexed citations
12.
Hempel, Susanne, Sydne J Newberry, Zhen Wang, et al.. (2012). Review of the Evidence on Falls Prevention in Hospitals: Task 4 Final Report.6 indexed citations
13.
Hempel, Susanne, Sydne J Newberry, Zhen Wang, et al.. (2012). Review of the Evidence on Falls Prevention in Hospitals.2 indexed citations
14.
Timbie, Justin W., Jeanne S. Ringel, Dave Fox, et al.. (2012). Opportunities for Future Research.
15.
Hempel, Susanne, Jeremy N. V. Miles, Marika J Suttorp, et al.. (2012). Detection of Associations Between Trial Quality and Effect Sizes.16 indexed citations
16.
Maglione, Margaret, Alicia Ruelaz Maher, Jianhui Hu, et al.. (2011). Off-Label Use of Atypical Antipsychotics: An Update [Internet].10 indexed citations
17.
Hempel, Susanne, Sydne J Newberry, Zhen Wang, et al.. (2011). Safety of probiotics used to reduce risk and prevent or treat disease.. PubMed. 1–645.173 indexed citations
18.
Maglione, Margaret, Alicia Ruelaz Maher, Jianhui Hu, et al.. (2011). Off-label use of atypical antipsychotics: an update. Europe PMC (PubMed Central).85 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.