Tania Chechi
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Surgery top 10%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Internal Medicine top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Co-authors
- Gaia SpazianiMassimo MargheriSabine VecchioGabriele GiulianiGuido VittoriVincenzo PasceriGregg W. StoneMarteen A. Vink
- Topics
- Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (18 papers)Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (18 papers)Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- ItalyNetherlandsDenmark
In The Last Decade
Tania Chechi
35 papers receiving 815 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 649
- Surgery 480
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 160
- Internal Medicine 157
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 81
Countries citing papers authored by Tania Chechi
This map shows the geographic impact of Tania Chechi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tania Chechi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tania Chechi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tania Chechi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tania Chechi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tania Chechi. The network helps show where Tania Chechi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tania Chechi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tania Chechi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tania Chechi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tania Chechi. Tania Chechi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 16 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 25 | |
| 5 | 60 | |
| 6 | 25 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 77 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 65 | |
| 14 | 70 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | Venture wire control catheter in percutaneous treatment of complex coronary bifurcation. A case report. | 2 |
| 17 | 47 | |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | 19 | |
| 20 | 61 |
About Tania Chechi
Tania Chechi is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Internal Medicine and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 35 papers that have together received 844 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (18 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (18 papers) and Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (157 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (649 citations) and Surgery (480 citations). Tania Chechi has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Netherlands and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Gaia Spaziani, Massimo Margheri, Sabine Vecchio, Gabriele Giuliani, Guido Vittori, Vincenzo Pasceri, Gregg W. Stone, Marteen A. Vink, Roberto Violini and Martin J. Schalij. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and Diabetes Care.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.