Tal Pupko

21.9k total citations · 8 hit papers
142 papers, 15.1k citations indexed

About

Tal Pupko is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Tal Pupko has authored 142 papers receiving a total of 15.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 119 papers in Molecular Biology, 46 papers in Genetics and 17 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Tal Pupko's work include Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (73 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (36 papers) and Genetic diversity and population structure (24 papers). Tal Pupko is often cited by papers focused on Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (73 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (36 papers) and Genetic diversity and population structure (24 papers). Tal Pupko collaborates with scholars based in Israel, United States and Japan. Tal Pupko's co-authors include Nir Ben‐Tal, Eric Martz, Haim Ashkenazy, Itay Mayrose, Fabian Glaser, Shiran Abadi, Elona Erez, Dan Graur, Inbal Paz and Ofir Cohen and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Nucleic Acids Research.

In The Last Decade

Tal Pupko

140 papers receiving 14.9k citations

Hit Papers

ConSurf 2016: an improved methodolo... 2002 2026 2010 2018 2016 2010 2005 2002 2015 500 1000 1.5k 2.0k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Tal Pupko Israel 50 10.7k 2.7k 1.7k 1.5k 1.1k 142 15.1k
Michael Remmert Germany 11 9.1k 0.9× 1.7k 0.6× 2.2k 1.2× 1.6k 1.1× 957 0.9× 14 14.0k
Lawrence A. Kelley United Kingdom 22 10.0k 0.9× 1.9k 0.7× 2.6k 1.5× 1.4k 0.9× 1.2k 1.1× 40 15.3k
Fabian Sievers Ireland 13 8.9k 0.8× 1.7k 0.6× 2.3k 1.4× 1.6k 1.1× 719 0.7× 16 14.2k
Kevin Karplus United States 36 12.5k 1.2× 1.9k 0.7× 2.3k 1.3× 1.7k 1.1× 1.7k 1.6× 83 18.8k
Lakshminarayan M. Iyer United States 56 10.7k 1.0× 2.3k 0.8× 1.8k 1.0× 1.6k 1.1× 409 0.4× 115 14.8k
Boris Maček Germany 55 10.7k 1.0× 1.7k 0.6× 1.4k 0.8× 995 0.7× 665 0.6× 203 14.7k
Andreas Heger United Kingdom 34 10.7k 1.0× 2.2k 0.8× 3.3k 1.9× 1.7k 1.2× 569 0.5× 55 15.9k
John‐Marc Chandonia United States 18 9.2k 0.9× 1.6k 0.6× 2.0k 1.1× 1.1k 0.7× 1.2k 1.1× 41 12.0k
Michael Y. Galperin United States 70 12.6k 1.2× 3.6k 1.3× 2.2k 1.2× 3.1k 2.1× 1.1k 1.0× 209 17.9k
Martin Steinegger South Korea 25 9.7k 0.9× 1.3k 0.5× 1.4k 0.8× 2.2k 1.4× 1.2k 1.1× 57 13.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Tal Pupko

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tal Pupko's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tal Pupko with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tal Pupko more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tal Pupko

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tal Pupko. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tal Pupko. The network helps show where Tal Pupko may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tal Pupko

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tal Pupko. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tal Pupko based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tal Pupko. Tal Pupko is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Avram, Oren, et al.. (2024). BetaAlign: a deep learning approach for multiple sequence alignment. Bioinformatics. 41(1). 3 indexed citations
2.
Mayrose, Itay, et al.. (2024). Statistical framework to determine indel-length distribution. Bioinformatics. 40(2). 3 indexed citations
3.
Novosolov, Maria, Carmela Gissi, Rade Garić, et al.. (2024). Evolutionary Insights from the Mitochondrial Genome of Oikopleura dioica : Sequencing Challenges, RNA Editing, Gene Transfers to the Nucleus, and tRNA Loss. Genome Biology and Evolution. 16(9). 2 indexed citations
4.
Huchon, Dorothée, et al.. (2024). A machine-learning-based alternative to phylogenetic bootstrap. Bioinformatics. 40(Supplement_1). i208–i217. 1 indexed citations
5.
Bowers, Robert M., Eric A. Newberry, Tal Pupko, et al.. (2024). Genetic and Functional Diversity Help Explain Pathogenic, Weakly Pathogenic, and Commensal Lifestyles in the Genus Xanthomonas. Genome Biology and Evolution. 16(4). 9 indexed citations
6.
Pupko, Tal, et al.. (2023). Evaluation of the Ability of AlphaFold to Predict the Three-Dimensional Structures of Antibodies and Epitopes. The Journal of Immunology. 211(10). 1578–1588. 13 indexed citations
7.
Huchon, Dorothée, et al.. (2023). GenomeFLTR: filtering reads made easy. Nucleic Acids Research. 51(W1). W232–W236. 4 indexed citations
8.
Yariv, Elon, Amit Kessel, Gal Masrati, et al.. (2023). Using evolutionary data to make sense of macromolecules with a “face‐lifted” ConSurf. Protein Science. 32(3). e4582–e4582. 186 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Stupp, Doron, et al.. (2022). Machine-learning of complex evolutionary signals improves classification of SNVs. NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics. 4(2). lqac025–lqac025. 4 indexed citations
11.
Avram, Oren, et al.. (2021). A Probabilistic Model for Indel Evolution: Differentiating Insertions from Deletions. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 38(12). 5769–5781. 17 indexed citations
12.
Avram, Oren, et al.. (2021). Harnessing Machine Learning To Unravel Protein Degradation in Escherichia coli. mSystems. 6(1). 16 indexed citations
13.
Ruano‐Gallego, David, Julia Sanchez‐Garrido, Caroline Mullineaux-Sanders, et al.. (2021). Type III secretion system effectors form robust and flexible intracellular virulence networks. Science. 371(6534). 70 indexed citations
14.
Abadi, Shiran, Oren Avram, Saharon Rosset, Tal Pupko, & Itay Mayrose. (2020). ModelTeller: Model Selection for Optimal Phylogenetic Reconstruction Using Machine Learning. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 37(11). 3338–3352. 31 indexed citations
15.
Abadi, Shiran, et al.. (2020). COVID ‐19 pandemic‐related lockdown: response time is more important than its strictness. EMBO Molecular Medicine. 12(11). e13171–e13171. 31 indexed citations
16.
Avram, Oren, et al.. (2019). M1CR0B1AL1Z3R—a user-friendly web server for the analysis of large-scale microbial genomics data. Nucleic Acids Research. 47(W1). W88–W92. 98 indexed citations
17.
Ashkenazy, Haim, Shiran Abadi, Eric Martz, et al.. (2016). ConSurf 2016: an improved methodology to estimate and visualize evolutionary conservation in macromolecules. Nucleic Acids Research. 44(W1). W344–W350. 2170 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Chalupowicz, Laura, et al.. (2016). Revealing the inventory of type III effectors in Pantoea agglomerans gall‐forming pathovars using draft genome sequences and a machine‐learning approach. Molecular Plant Pathology. 19(2). 381–392. 24 indexed citations
19.
Mayrose, Itay, Adi Doron‐Faigenboim, Eran Bacharach, & Tal Pupko. (2007). Towards realistic codon models: among site variability and dependency of synonymous and non-synonymous rates. Bioinformatics. 23(13). i319–i327. 47 indexed citations
20.
Landau, Meytal, Itay Mayrose, Y. Rosenberg, et al.. (2005). ConSurf 2005: the projection of evolutionary conservation scores of residues on protein structures. Nucleic Acids Research. 33(Web Server). W299–W302. 1144 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026