Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
JNdi-1: a neodymium isotopic reference in consistency with LaJolla neodymium
20001.5k citationsHiroo Kagami, Takuji HAMAMOTO et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Takuji HAMAMOTO
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Takuji HAMAMOTO's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Takuji HAMAMOTO with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Takuji HAMAMOTO more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Takuji HAMAMOTO. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Takuji HAMAMOTO. The network helps show where Takuji HAMAMOTO may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Takuji HAMAMOTO
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Takuji HAMAMOTO.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Takuji HAMAMOTO based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Takuji HAMAMOTO. Takuji HAMAMOTO is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
HAMAMOTO, Takuji, et al.. (2000). Simplified Equation For Estimating Added Mass Distribution Over Large Floating Structures. The Proceedings of the ... International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. 1. 57–64.1 indexed citations
9.
HAMAMOTO, Takuji, et al.. (2000). Rb, Sr, Sm and Nd concentrations of GSJ, KIGAM and BCR-1 rock reference samples analyzed by isotope dilution method. 15. 23–34.8 indexed citations
10.
Inoue, Masashi, Yasuo Tanaka, & Takuji HAMAMOTO. (1999). Elastic Response Reduction of Large Floating Structures By Tuning Wet Mode Shapes. The Proceedings of the ... International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. 1. 43–50.1 indexed citations
11.
Yoshida, Masaru, V. A. Glebovitsky, Takuji HAMAMOTO, et al.. (1998). Geological survey in southern to eastern peninsular India, 1996. Journal of Geosciences. 41(37). 47–75.2 indexed citations
12.
HAMAMOTO, Takuji, et al.. (1998). 3D BEM-FEM hybrid hydroelastic analysis of module linked large floating structures subjected to regular waves. The Proceedings of the ... International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. 1. 192–199.6 indexed citations
HAMAMOTO, Takuji, et al.. (1996). 3D BEM-FEM Coupled Hydroelastic Analysis of Irregular Shaped, Module Linked Large Floating Structures. The Proceedings of the ... International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. 1. 362–369.3 indexed citations
17.
HAMAMOTO, Takuji, et al.. (1996). Experimental Modal Analysis By Harmonic Sweep Excitation On Unit Linked Floating Models. The Proceedings of the ... International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. 3. 341–348.1 indexed citations
HAMAMOTO, Takuji, et al.. (1994). LOCAL DAMAGE DETECTION OF FLEXIBLE OFFSHORE PLATFORMS USING AMBIENT VIBRATION MEASUREMENT. The Proceedings of the ... International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. 4. 400–470.12 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.