Tadas Stumbrys

948 citations
36 papers · 595 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Tadas Stumbrys

32 papers receiving 563 citations

Peers

Tadas Stumbrys
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 436
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 556
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 104
  • Clinical Psychology 69
  • Social Psychology 69
Replace Aurélie Ponz with:
Aurélie Ponz France
Josie Malinowski United Kingdom
Jessica D. Creery United States
Olaf Lahl Germany
Caroline L. Horton United Kingdom
Maren Jasmin Cordi Switzerland
Tommi Makkonen Finland
Miranda Occhionero Italy
Zsófia Zavecz Hungary
Sara E. Alger United States
Tadas Stumbrys relative to Aurélie Ponz France Aurélie Ponz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Aurélie Ponz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tadas Stumbrys

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tadas Stumbrys's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tadas Stumbrys with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tadas Stumbrys more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tadas Stumbrys

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tadas Stumbrys. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tadas Stumbrys. The network helps show where Tadas Stumbrys may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Tadas Stumbrys, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tadas Stumbrys Line = papers co-authored together Tadas Stumbrys links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012115
2 201361
3 201459
4 201346
5 201535
6 201232
7 201529
8 201028
9 201426
10 201225
11 201621
12 201617
13 202014
14 201113
15 20119
16 20148
17 20177
18 20187
19 20216
20 20165

About Tadas Stumbrys

Tadas Stumbrys is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 36 papers that have together received 595 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and Wakefulness Research (33 papers), Sleep and related disorders (27 papers), Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (5 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (4 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (4 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (4 papers), Child Therapy and Development (3 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (436 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (556 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (104 citations), Clinical Psychology (69 citations) and Social Psychology (69 citations). Tadas Stumbrys has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and Lithuania. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Erlacher, Michael Schredl, Miriam J. Johnson, Michael Daniels, Peter Malinowski, Steffen Schmidt, David Hamilton, Sam Gandy, Helané Wahbeh and Garret Yount. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Consciousness and Cognition, International journal of dream research, Journal of Sports Sciences and Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact