Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The proxy problem: child report versus parent report in health-related quality of life research
1998556 citationsN.C.M. Theunissen, T. Vogels et al.Quality of Life Researchprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of T. Vogels's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. Vogels with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. Vogels more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. Vogels. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. Vogels. The network helps show where T. Vogels may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of T. Vogels
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T. Vogels.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T. Vogels based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with T. Vogels. T. Vogels is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kamphuis, M., H.W. Vliegen, S.P. Verloove-Vanhorick, Jaap Ottenkamp, & T. Vogels. (2005). Arbeidsparticipatie en werkgerelateerde handicaps bij jongvolwassenen met een aangeboren hartafwijking [Employment and work-related handicaps in young adults with congenital heart disease]. Nederlandsch tijdschrift voor geneeskunde/Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde/NTvG-databank.2 indexed citations
Vogels, T., et al.. (2000). TACQOL manual: parent form and child form. TNO Repository.58 indexed citations
10.
Kater, Arnon P., et al.. (1999). [Quality of life in children with sickle cell disease in Amsterdam area].. PubMed. 143(41). 2049–53.25 indexed citations
11.
Vogels, T., et al.. (1999). AIDS-related knowledge, attitudes, and behavior: a comparison of Dutch students and dropouts.. PubMed. 34(134). 369–79.6 indexed citations
12.
Vogels, T., et al.. (1999). TACQOL manual parent form and child form 6-11 years. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).4 indexed citations
Theunissen, N.C.M., T. Vogels, Hendrik M. Koopman, et al.. (1998). The proxy problem: child report versus parent report in health-related quality of life research. Quality of Life Research. 7(5). 387–397.556 indexed citations breakdown →
Vogels, T., E. Brugman, & G. van Zessen. (1997). Het gebruik van alcohol, marihuana en XTC door scholieren in het voortgezet onderwijs; 1990 - 1995 [ Use of alcohol, cannabis and XTC by pupils in secondary education 1990- 1995 in the Netherlands ]. TNO Repository.1 indexed citations
Kok, C.J., et al.. (1994). Signaleren van psychosociale problematiek bij adolescenten.. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 72. 363–368.1 indexed citations
20.
Vogels, T., et al.. (1994). Lijf, sport en middelen; een verkennend onderzoek naar het gebruik van prestatie verhogende middelen bij jonge mensen. TNO Repository.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.