T. Schlüter
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Radiation
- Biomedical Engineering
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Co-authors
- Johannes RauchChristian‐Alexander BungeThomas GriesMarkus BeckersThomas VadMichael KrämerAlexander MückStefan Dittmaier
- Topics
- Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (5 papers)Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (4 papers)High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (3 papers)
In The Last Decade
T. Schlüter
12 papers receiving 120 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 62
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 50
- Radiation 13
- Biomedical Engineering 12
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 6
Countries citing papers authored by T. Schlüter
This map shows the geographic impact of T. Schlüter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. Schlüter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. Schlüter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by T. Schlüter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. Schlüter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. Schlüter. The network helps show where T. Schlüter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of T. Schlüter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T. Schlüter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T. Schlüter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with T. Schlüter. T. Schlüter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 23 | |
| 3 | An innovative extrusion technology for the melt spinning of polymer optical fibers used for light transmission over short distances | 3 |
| 4 | 49 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 32 |
About T. Schlüter
T. Schlüter is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiation and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 13 papers that have together received 121 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (5 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (4 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (62 citations), Radiation (13 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (50 citations). T. Schlüter has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Johannes Rauch, Christian‐Alexander Bunge, Thomas Gries, Markus Beckers, Thomas Vad, Michael Krämer, Alexander Mück, Stefan Dittmaier, P. Kvasnička and G. Casarosa. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of High Energy Physics, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment and Polymer International.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.