T. Renstrøm

1.7k total citations
41 papers, 621 citations indexed

About

T. Renstrøm is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiation and Aerospace Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, T. Renstrøm has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 621 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 38 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 19 papers in Radiation and 13 papers in Aerospace Engineering. Recurrent topics in T. Renstrøm's work include Nuclear physics research studies (38 papers), Astronomical and nuclear sciences (23 papers) and Nuclear Physics and Applications (16 papers). T. Renstrøm is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear physics research studies (38 papers), Astronomical and nuclear sciences (23 papers) and Nuclear Physics and Applications (16 papers). T. Renstrøm collaborates with scholars based in Norway, United States and South Africa. T. Renstrøm's co-authors include A. C. Larsen, S. Siem, A. Görgen, M. Guttormsen, G. M. Tveten, F. L. Bello Garrote, T. W. Hagen, M. Wiedeking, F. Giacoppo and H. T. Nyhus and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Physics Letters B.

In The Last Decade

T. Renstrøm

38 papers receiving 612 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
T. Renstrøm Norway 15 559 286 177 148 78 41 621
G. M. Tveten Norway 16 622 1.1× 291 1.0× 181 1.0× 205 1.4× 71 0.9× 39 675
R. Raut India 15 552 1.0× 256 0.9× 100 0.6× 244 1.6× 87 1.1× 65 625
H. T. Nyhus Norway 15 514 0.9× 245 0.9× 177 1.0× 158 1.1× 50 0.6× 24 557
G. Perdikakis United States 14 603 1.1× 275 1.0× 193 1.1× 213 1.4× 33 0.4× 45 674
C. Nair Germany 14 499 0.9× 286 1.0× 137 0.8× 152 1.0× 67 0.9× 28 554
V.A. Plujko Ukraine 12 501 0.9× 266 0.9× 231 1.3× 172 1.2× 54 0.7× 60 574
K. Banerjee India 18 721 1.3× 315 1.1× 202 1.1× 306 2.1× 81 1.0× 98 873
F. D. Smit South Africa 15 590 1.1× 181 0.6× 127 0.7× 237 1.6× 87 1.1× 52 639
K. Kosev Germany 15 582 1.0× 317 1.1× 159 0.9× 185 1.3× 80 1.0× 27 634
M. R. D. Rodrigues Italy 15 467 0.8× 247 0.9× 104 0.6× 147 1.0× 47 0.6× 56 567

Countries citing papers authored by T. Renstrøm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T. Renstrøm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. Renstrøm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. Renstrøm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T. Renstrøm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. Renstrøm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. Renstrøm. The network helps show where T. Renstrøm may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of T. Renstrøm

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T. Renstrøm. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T. Renstrøm based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with T. Renstrøm. T. Renstrøm is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Utsunomiya, H., S. Goriely, M. Kimura, et al.. (2024). Photoneutron emission cross sections for C13. Physical review. C. 109(1). 3 indexed citations
2.
Lewis, R., A. Couture, S. N. Liddick, et al.. (2023). Statistical (n,$$\gamma $$) cross section model comparison for short-lived nuclei. The European Physical Journal A. 59(3). 42–42.
3.
Larsen, A. C., G. M. Tveten, P. von Neumann–Cosel, et al.. (2023). Nuclear level densities and γ-ray strength functions of Sn111,112,113 isotopes studied with the Oslo method. Physical review. C. 108(1). 9 indexed citations
4.
Wiedeking, M., S. Siem, S. Goriely, et al.. (2021). Statistical properties of the well deformed Sm153,155 nuclei and the scissors resonance. Physical review. C. 103(1). 9 indexed citations
5.
Kibédi, T., B. Alshahrani, A. E. Stuchbery, et al.. (2020). Radiative Width of the Hoyle State from γ-Ray Spectroscopy. Physical Review Letters. 125(18). 182701–182701. 18 indexed citations
6.
Guttormsen, M., A. C. Larsen, J. E. Midtbø, et al.. (2018). Gamma-widths, lifetimes and fluctuations in the nuclear quasi-continuum. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 1 indexed citations
7.
Utsunomiya, H., Takashi Ariizumi, I. Gheorghe, et al.. (2018). Photon-flux determination by the Poisson-fitting technique with quenching corrections. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 896. 103–107. 17 indexed citations
8.
Spyrou, A., A. C. Larsen, S. N. Liddick, et al.. (2017). Neutron-capture rates for explosive nucleosynthesis: the case of68Ni(n,γ)69Ni. Journal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics. 44(4). 44002–44002. 9 indexed citations
9.
Guttormsen, M., A. C. Larsen, A. Görgen, et al.. (2017). Is The Generalized Brink-Axel Hypothesis Valid?. 62–62. 1 indexed citations
10.
Campo, L. Crespo, A. C. Larsen, F. L. Bello Garrote, et al.. (2017). Investigating the γ decay of Ni65 from particle-γ coincidence data. Physical review. C. 96(1). 5 indexed citations
11.
Guttormsen, M., A. C. Larsen, A. Görgen, et al.. (2016). Validity of the Generalized Brink-Axel Hypothesis inNp238. Physical Review Letters. 116(1). 12502–12502. 45 indexed citations
12.
Campo, L. Crespo, F. L. Bello Garrote, T. K. Eriksen, et al.. (2016). Statistical γ-decay properties of Ni64 and deduced (n,γ) cross section of the s-process branch-point nucleus Ni63. Physical review. C. 94(4). 12 indexed citations
13.
Kheswa, B. V., M. Wiedeking, F. Giacoppo, et al.. (2015). Galactic production of 138La: Impact of 138,139La statistical properties. Physics Letters B. 744. 268–272. 25 indexed citations
14.
Giacoppo, F., F. L. Bello Garrote, L. A. Bernstein, et al.. (2015). γdecay from the quasicontinuum ofAu197,198. Physical Review C. 91(5). 8 indexed citations
15.
Giacoppo, F., F. L. Bello Garrote, T. K. Eriksen, et al.. (2015). Observation of low-lying resonances in the quasicontinuum of195,196Pt and enhanced astrophysical reaction rates. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 93. 1039–1039. 3 indexed citations
16.
Spyrou, A., S. N. Liddick, A. C. Larsen, et al.. (2014). Novel technique for Constrainingr-Process (n,γ) Reaction Rates. Physical Review Letters. 113(23). 232502–232502. 88 indexed citations
17.
Utsunomiya, H., Tatsushi Shima, D. Filipescu, et al.. (2014). Energy Calibration of the NewSUBARU Storage Ring for Laser Compton-Scattering Gamma Rays and Applications. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. 61(3). 1252–1258. 33 indexed citations
18.
Larsen, A. C., S. Goriely, M. Guttormsen, et al.. (2013). Astrophysical Reaction Rates and the Low-energy Enhancement in the <span class="cmmi-10">γ</span> Strength. Acta Physica Polonica B. 44(3). 563–563. 1 indexed citations
19.
Guttormsen, M., L. A. Bernstein, A. Bürger, et al.. (2012). Observation of Large Scissors Resonance Strength in Actinides. Physical Review Letters. 109(16). 162503–162503. 47 indexed citations
20.
Wilson, J. N., F. Gunsing, L. A. Bernstein, et al.. (2012). Indirect (n,γ) cross sections of thorium cycle nuclei using the surrogate method. Physical Review C. 85(3). 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by G. M. Tveten Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by R. Raut Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by H. T. Nyhus Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by G. Perdikakis Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by C. Nair Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by V.A. Plujko Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by K. Banerjee Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by F. D. Smit Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by K. Kosev Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M. R. D. Rodrigues
Rankless by CCL
2026