G. Perdikakis

2.2k total citations
45 papers, 674 citations indexed

About

G. Perdikakis is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiation and Aerospace Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, G. Perdikakis has authored 45 papers receiving a total of 674 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 38 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 28 papers in Radiation and 18 papers in Aerospace Engineering. Recurrent topics in G. Perdikakis's work include Nuclear physics research studies (36 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (24 papers) and Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (15 papers). G. Perdikakis is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear physics research studies (36 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (24 papers) and Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (15 papers). G. Perdikakis collaborates with scholars based in United States, Greece and France. G. Perdikakis's co-authors include A. Lagoyannis, M. Kokkoris, N. Patronis, C. Papachristodoulou, A. Spyrou, D. Pierroutsakou, N. Alamanos, A. Pakou, A. Gillibert and E. C. Pollacco and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and Physics Letters B.

In The Last Decade

G. Perdikakis

43 papers receiving 658 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
G. Perdikakis United States 14 603 275 213 193 49 45 674
П. Фігуера Italy 16 593 1.0× 238 0.9× 262 1.2× 108 0.6× 61 1.2× 60 691
D. Galaviz Germany 16 567 0.9× 249 0.9× 195 0.9× 88 0.5× 28 0.6× 50 625
D. C. Biswas India 15 733 1.2× 329 1.2× 244 1.1× 215 1.1× 15 0.3× 92 782
M. Veselský United States 17 718 1.2× 156 0.6× 147 0.7× 243 1.3× 34 0.7× 54 742
P. Figuera Italy 15 649 1.1× 177 0.6× 333 1.6× 95 0.5× 43 0.9× 52 710
T. Renstrøm Norway 15 559 0.9× 286 1.0× 148 0.7× 177 0.9× 26 0.5× 41 621
H. Ströher Germany 19 876 1.5× 268 1.0× 217 1.0× 116 0.6× 17 0.3× 54 1.0k
B. B. Back United States 13 681 1.1× 278 1.0× 238 1.1× 216 1.1× 20 0.4× 41 715
M. Notani Japan 18 919 1.5× 365 1.3× 414 1.9× 148 0.8× 28 0.6× 44 967
E. Hanelt Germany 16 625 1.0× 324 1.2× 249 1.2× 205 1.1× 16 0.3× 36 712

Countries citing papers authored by G. Perdikakis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Perdikakis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Perdikakis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Perdikakis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Perdikakis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Perdikakis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Perdikakis. The network helps show where G. Perdikakis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Perdikakis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Perdikakis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Perdikakis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. Perdikakis. G. Perdikakis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lewis, R., A. Couture, S. N. Liddick, et al.. (2023). Statistical (n,$$\gamma $$) cross section model comparison for short-lived nuclei. The European Physical Journal A. 59(3). 42–42.
2.
Kuvin, S. A., Hye Young Lee, B. DiGiovine, et al.. (2022). Direct measurement of Ni59(n,p)Co59 and Ni59(n,α)Fe56 at fast-neutron energies from 500 keV to 10 MeV. Physical review. C. 105(4). 6 indexed citations
3.
Voinov, A., C. R. Brune, S. M. Grimes, et al.. (2021). Reduction of the neutron imaginary potential off the stability line and its possible impact on neutron capture rates. Physical review. C. 104(1). 2 indexed citations
4.
Denissenkov, Pavel A., Falk Herwig, G. Perdikakis, & H. Schatz. (2021). The impact of (n,γ) reaction rate uncertainties of unstable isotopes on the i-process nucleosynthesis of the elements from Ba to W. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 503(3). 3913–3925. 10 indexed citations
5.
Denissenkov, Pavel A., et al.. (2019). The impact of (n,γ) reaction rate uncertainties on the predicted abundances of i-process elements with 32 ≤ Z ≤ 48 in the metal-poor star HD94028. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 491(4). 5179–5187. 7 indexed citations
6.
Berg, G.P.A., M. Couder, K. Smith, et al.. (2017). Design of SECAR a recoil mass separator for astrophysical capture reactions with radioactive beams. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 877. 87–103. 12 indexed citations
7.
Perdikakis, G., et al.. (2016). Measurement of the equilibrium charge state distributions of Ni, Co, and Cu beams in Mo at 2 MeV/u: Review and evaluation of the relevant semi-empirical models. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 373. 117–125. 2 indexed citations
8.
Spyrou, A., S. N. Liddick, A. C. Larsen, et al.. (2014). Novel technique for Constrainingr-Process (n,γ) Reaction Rates. Physical Review Letters. 113(23). 232502–232502. 88 indexed citations
9.
Wu, Xiaoyu, Chris Compton, A. Facco, et al.. (2013). The design and commissioning of the accelerator system of the rare isotope reaccelerator - REA3 at Michigan State University. 269–273. 2 indexed citations
10.
Schwarz, S., G. Perdikakis, M. Portillo, et al.. (2013). The ReA electron-beam ion trap charge breeder for reacceleration of rare isotopes. AIP conference proceedings. 497–502. 6 indexed citations
11.
Leitner, Daniela, John Popielarski, F. Montes, et al.. (2011). Status of the ReAccelerator Facility ReA for Rare Isotopes. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 5 indexed citations
12.
Perdikakis, G., R. G. T. Zegers, Sam M. Austin, et al.. (2011). Gamow-Teller unit cross sections for (t,He3) and (He3,t) reactions. Physical Review C. 83(5). 15 indexed citations
13.
Guess, C. J., R. G. T. Zegers, B. A. Brown, et al.. (2009). Spectroscopy ofB13via theC13(t,He3)reaction at115AMeV. Physical Review C. 80(2). 11 indexed citations
15.
Stoker, J., P. F. Mantica, D. Bazin, et al.. (2009). β-decay half-life of therp-process waiting-point nuclideMo84. Physical Review C. 79(1). 13 indexed citations
16.
Perdikakis, G., C. Papadopoulos, R. Vlastou, et al.. (2006). Measurement of theAm241(n,2n)reaction cross section using the activation method. Physical Review C. 73(6). 8 indexed citations
17.
Pakou, A., N. G. Nicolis, К. Rusek, et al.. (2005). α-particle production: Direct and compound contribution in the reactionLi7+Si28at near-barrier energies. Physical Review C. 71(6). 23 indexed citations
18.
Pakou, A., N. Alamanos, A. Gillibert, et al.. (2004). Elastic scattering of 7Li+28Si at near-barrier energies. Physical review. C. 69(5). 1 indexed citations
19.
Pakou, A., N. Alamanos, A. Lagoyannis, et al.. (2003). The elastic scattering of 6Li+28Si at near-barrier energies. Physics Letters B. 556(1-2). 21–26. 76 indexed citations
20.
Karamanis, D., S. Andriamonje, P.A. Assimakopoulos, et al.. (2003). Neutron cross-section measurements in the Th–U cycle by the activation method. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 505(1-2). 381–384. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026