Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Petri nets: Properties, analysis and applications
19896.8k citationsT. MurataProceedings of the IEEEprofile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of T. Murata's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. Murata with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. Murata more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. Murata. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. Murata. The network helps show where T. Murata may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of T. Murata
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T. Murata.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T. Murata based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with T. Murata. T. Murata is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Murata, T., et al.. (2002). Modeling and simulation of routing protocol for mobile ad hoc networks using colored petri nets. Formal Methods. 145–153.21 indexed citations
Zhou, Yi & T. Murata. (2001). Modeling And Analysis Of Distributed Multimedia Synchronization By Extended Fuzzy-Timing Petri Nets. 5(4). 23–37.5 indexed citations
8.
Zhou, Yi, T. Murata, Thomas A. DeFanti, & Hui Zhang. (2000). Fuzzy-Timing Petri Net Modeling and Simulation of a Networked Virtual Environment: NICE. IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics Communications and Computer Sciences. 83(11). 2166–2176.2 indexed citations
Murata, T., et al.. (1996). Fuzzy-Timing High-level Petri Net Model of a Real-Time Network Protocol. ITC-CSCC :International Technical Conference on Circuits Systems, Computers and Communications. 1170–1173.2 indexed citations
11.
Murata, T., et al.. (1994). A Petri Net Model for Nonmonotonic Reasoning Based on Annotated Logic Programs (Special Section on Net Theory and Its Applications). IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics Communications and Computer Sciences. 77(10). 1579–1587.1 indexed citations
12.
Murata, T., et al.. (1992). Graph Models for Static Analysis of Ada Tasking Programs. 1992(59). 141–150.2 indexed citations
13.
Lin, Chuang & T. Murata. (1990). Applications of Petri nets to Non-Monotonic Logic. International Symposium on Circuits and Systems. 530–535.2 indexed citations
Murata, T. & Jaegeol Yim. (1989). Petri Net Method for Real-Time Control of Rule-Based Systems.. Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering. 122–127.2 indexed citations
16.
Murata, T.. (1989). Petri nets: Properties, analysis and applications. Proceedings of the IEEE. 77(4). 541–580.6798 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Zhang, Du, et al.. (1987). Stochastic Net Model for Self-Stability Measures of Fault Tolerant Clock Synchronization. 104–110.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.