Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Einstein Observatory Extended Medium-Sensitivity Survey. II - The optical identifications
1991413 citationsJohn T. Stocke, I. M. Gioia et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of T. Maccacaro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. Maccacaro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. Maccacaro more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. Maccacaro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. Maccacaro. The network helps show where T. Maccacaro may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of T. Maccacaro
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T. Maccacaro.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T. Maccacaro based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with T. Maccacaro. T. Maccacaro is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Carrera, F. J., J. Ebrero, S. Mateos, et al.. (2007). The XMM-Newton serendipitous survey. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 469(1). 27–46.44 indexed citations
3.
Caccianiga, A., P. Severgnini, R. Della Ceca, et al.. (2007). The XMM-Newton bright serendipitous survey. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 477(3). 735–746.27 indexed citations
Severgnini, P., A. Caccianiga, V. Braito, et al.. (2006). An X-ray bright ERO hosting a type 2 QSO. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology).11 indexed citations
Ceca, R. Della, V. Braito, V. Beckmann, et al.. (2003). A hard medium survey with ASCA. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 406(2). 555–563.11 indexed citations
Ceca, R. Della, et al.. (1997). A hard medium survey with the ASCA GIS.. MmSAI. 68. 333–334.1 indexed citations
14.
Molendi, S. & T. Maccacaro. (1994). The variable soft X-ray excess of MKN 766.. A&A. 291. 420–424.1 indexed citations
15.
Maccacaro, T., A. Wolter, B. McLean, et al.. (1994). The Einstein observatory extended medium sensitivity survey. III. The atlas of optical finding charts.. 29. 267–272.16 indexed citations
16.
Chincarini, G., A. Iovino, T. Maccacaro, & Dario Maccagni. (1993). Observational Cosmology Symposium. ASPC. 51.1 indexed citations
17.
Molendi, S., et al.. (1992). Variability of the Seyfert galaxy MKN 766 in the ROSAT all sky survey. STIN. 271(1). 17591–24.2 indexed citations
Murray, S. S., M. Elvis, W. Forman, et al.. (1987). The AXAF High Resolution Camera (HRC) and its Use for Observations of Distant Clusters of Galaxies. 26. 113.7 indexed citations
20.
Giommi, P., D. Maccagni, B. Garilli, et al.. (1985). X-ray and Optical Observations of Four X-ray Selected BL Lac Objects. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 17. 608.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.