T Kita
- Co-authors
- Naoki TerakawaJunzo KigawaIkuo SatoYoshihiro KikuchiToru SugiyamaToshiharu KamuraKouji TaguchiMitsuaki Suzuki
- Topics
- Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (4 papers)Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (3 papers)Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- Japan
In The Last Decade
T Kita
14 papers receiving 857 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Reproductive Medicine 576
- Molecular Biology 310
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 237
- Oncology 179
- Immunology 157
Countries citing papers authored by T Kita
This map shows the geographic impact of T Kita's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T Kita with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T Kita more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by T Kita
This network shows the impact of papers produced by T Kita. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T Kita. The network helps show where T Kita may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of T Kita
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T Kita. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T Kita based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with T Kita. T Kita is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 42 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | Clinical characteristics of clear cell carcinoma of the ovarybreakdown → | 669 |
| 5 | 33 | |
| 6 | 100 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | [Circumvention of cisplatin resistant ovarian cancer cells by antiestrogens]. | 1 |
| 9 | [Potentiation of cisplatin sensitivity of cisplatin-resistant human ovarian cancer cell lines by L-buthionine-S,R-sulfoximine]. | 2 |
| 10 | Prediction of clinical course and recurrence of human ovarian cancer by several serum tumor markers. | 2 |
| 11 | [Pathophysiology during follow-up after extensive pancreatectomy]. | 3 |
| 12 | [Importance of nutritional management for the treatment of carcinoma of the pancreas]. | 3 |
| 13 | Enhancement of antineoplastic effects of cisplatin by a calmodulin antagonist (W-7) in nude mice bearing human ovarian carcinoma. | 1 |
| 14 | [Inhibition of human ovarian cancer cell growth by prostaglandin D2]. | 1 |
About T Kita
T Kita is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine and Nephrology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 871 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (4 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (3 papers) and Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (576 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (237 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (135 citations). T Kita has collaborated with scholars based in Japan. Frequent co-authors include Naoki Terakawa, Junzo Kigawa, Ikuo Sato, Yoshihiro Kikuchi, Toru Sugiyama, Toshiharu Kamura, Kouji Taguchi, Mitsuaki Suzuki, Yoshio Wakatsuki and Shuichi Kaneko. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, The Journal of Immunology and Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.