T. J. Swift
- Spectroscopy top 1%
- Materials Chemistry top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 5%
- Biophysics top 1%
- Co-authors
- Robert E. ConnickO. FritzCecil CooperGrégoire KuntzT. A. STEPHENSONAnthony A. GalloHenry Z. SableRaymond Novak
- Topics
- Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (5 papers)Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (4 papers)Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (4 papers)
- Journals
- NatureProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of the American Chemical Society
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
T. J. Swift
36 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Spectroscopy 687
- Materials Chemistry 562
- Molecular Biology 400
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 369
- Biophysics 302
Countries citing papers authored by T. J. Swift
This map shows the geographic impact of T. J. Swift's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. J. Swift with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. J. Swift more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by T. J. Swift
This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. J. Swift. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. J. Swift. The network helps show where T. J. Swift may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of T. J. Swift
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T. J. Swift. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T. J. Swift based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with T. J. Swift. T. J. Swift is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 32 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 94 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 45 | |
| 12 | 40 | |
| 13 | 18 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 48 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | 26 | |
| 20 | NMR-Relaxation Mechanisms of O17 in Aqueous Solutions of Paramagnetic Cations and the Lifetime of Water Molecules in the First Coordination Spherebreakdown → | 1095 |
About T. J. Swift
T. J. Swift is a scholar working on Filtration and Separation, Clinical Biochemistry and Spectroscopy, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (5 papers), Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (4 papers) and Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Filtration and Separation (110 citations), Biophysics (302 citations) and Spectroscopy (687 citations). T. J. Swift has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert E. Connick, O. Fritz, Cecil Cooper, Grégoire Kuntz, T. A. STEPHENSON, Anthony A. Gallo, Henry Z. Sable, Raymond Novak, Dale R. Clutter and Jane Anderson. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.