Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A Study of the Ecology of West Nile Virus in Egypt
1956256 citationsR. M. Taylor, T. H. Work et al.American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygieneprofile →
Sindbis Virus: A Newly Recognized Arthropod-Transmitted Virus
1955198 citationsR. M. Taylor, Herbert S. Hurlbut et al.American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygieneprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of T. H. Work's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. H. Work with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. H. Work more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. H. Work. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. H. Work. The network helps show where T. H. Work may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of T. H. Work
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T. H. Work.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T. H. Work based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with T. H. Work. T. H. Work is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Work, T. H., et al.. (1983). Ecological aspects of California encephalitis viruses in the arid west.. PubMed. 123. 269–76.2 indexed citations
2.
Work, T. H., et al.. (1977). Tracing the patterns of disease : the role of epidemiology and biometry. Medical Entomology and Zoology.1 indexed citations
Shah, K. V. & T. H. Work. (1969). Bhanja virus: a new arbovirus from ticks Haemaphysalis intermedia Warburton and Nuttall, 1909, in Orissa, India.. PubMed. 57(5). 793–8.28 indexed citations
Work, T. H.. (1963). TICK-BORNE VIRUSES. A REVIEW OF AN ARTHROPOD-BORNE VIRUS PROBLEM OF GROWING IMPORTANCE IN THE TROPICS.. PubMed. 29. 59–74.
15.
Work, T. H., et al.. (1960). Kyasnur Forest Disease. Part VII. Pathological Findings in Monkeys, Presbytis entellus and Macaca radiata, found Dead in the Forest.. The Indian Journal of Medical Research. 48(3). 276–286.6 indexed citations
Work, T. H. & Harold Trapido. (1957). Kyasanur Forest Disease. A New Virus Disease in India. Summary of Preliminary Report of Investigations of the Virus Research Centre on an Epidemic Disease affecting Forest Villagers and Wild Monkeys of Shimoga District, Mysore.. Indian Journal of Medical Sciences. 11(5).22 indexed citations
Work, T. H., et al.. (1956). Serological Diagnosis of Japanese B Type of Encephalitis in North Arcot District of Madras State, India, with Epidemiological Notes.. Indian Journal of Medical Sciences. 10(8).12 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.