T. Edward Reed
- Genetics top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Arthur R. JensenMaria Teresa ZenzesWilliam J. SchullJames V. NeelWalter F. BodmerJ A SvedRyszard BieleckiH. Kalant
- Topics
- Blood groups and transfusion (7 papers)Reproductive Biology and Fertility (6 papers)Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
T. Edward Reed
76 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 155
- Genetics 520
- Molecular Biology 289
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 199
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 196
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 183
Countries citing papers authored by T. Edward Reed
This map shows the geographic impact of T. Edward Reed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. Edward Reed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. Edward Reed more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by T. Edward Reed
This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. Edward Reed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. Edward Reed. The network helps show where T. Edward Reed may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of T. Edward Reed
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T. Edward Reed. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T. Edward Reed based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with T. Edward Reed. T. Edward Reed is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 42 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 71 | |
| 6 | 57 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 29 | |
| 15 | 28 | |
| 16 | Real-time Launch Vehicle Steering Programme Selection | 6 |
| 17 | 137 | |
| 18 | 61 | |
| 19 | 28 | |
| 20 | A pedigree of aniridia with a discussion of germinal mosaicism in man. | 28 |
About T. Edward Reed
T. Edward Reed is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Hematology and Genetics, having authored 77 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blood groups and transfusion (7 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (6 papers) and Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (520 citations), Reproductive Medicine (153 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (183 citations). T. Edward Reed has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Arthur R. Jensen, Maria Teresa Zenzes, William J. Schull, James V. Neel, Walter F. Bodmer, J A Sved, Ryszard Bielecki, H. Kalant, Qutub H. Qazi and Robert F. Casper. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.