T. de Rooij

445 total citations
9 papers, 124 citations indexed

About

T. de Rooij is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, T. de Rooij has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 124 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Surgery, 8 papers in Oncology and 3 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in T. de Rooij's work include Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (7 papers), Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (6 papers) and Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (2 papers). T. de Rooij is often cited by papers focused on Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (7 papers), Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (6 papers) and Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (2 papers). T. de Rooij collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Sweden. T. de Rooij's co-authors include Marc G. Besselink, Olivier R. Busch, Mohammad Abu Hilal, Justine Korteweg, Susan van Dieren, Krijn P. van Lienden, Thomas M. van Gulik, Sjors Klompmaker, John R. Richardson and Robert Sitarz and has published in prestigious journals such as British journal of surgery, Surgical Endoscopy and HPB.

In The Last Decade

T. de Rooij

9 papers receiving 121 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
T. de Rooij Netherlands 4 112 80 64 29 16 9 124
A. Floortje van Oosten Netherlands 7 176 1.6× 109 1.4× 102 1.6× 29 1.0× 16 1.0× 9 191
Paul Rat France 6 64 0.6× 116 1.4× 109 1.7× 18 0.6× 24 1.5× 11 179
Rupaly Pandé United Kingdom 7 125 1.1× 77 1.0× 68 1.1× 20 0.7× 5 0.3× 27 146
K. Taku Japan 6 68 0.6× 41 0.5× 48 0.8× 22 0.8× 6 0.4× 12 107
Ana Minaya‐Bravo Spain 7 43 0.4× 66 0.8× 28 0.4× 31 1.1× 15 0.9× 17 132
Takahiro Utsumi Japan 7 112 1.0× 58 0.7× 83 1.3× 9 0.3× 17 1.1× 21 159
Laura Lamonaca Italy 7 97 0.9× 113 1.4× 119 1.9× 17 0.6× 45 2.8× 26 183
Wenxiang Wang China 8 139 1.2× 73 0.9× 186 2.9× 8 0.3× 15 0.9× 25 232
Altaf Awan United Kingdom 6 64 0.6× 69 0.9× 49 0.8× 22 0.8× 14 0.9× 14 118

Countries citing papers authored by T. de Rooij

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T. de Rooij's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. de Rooij with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. de Rooij more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T. de Rooij

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. de Rooij. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. de Rooij. The network helps show where T. de Rooij may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of T. de Rooij

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T. de Rooij. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T. de Rooij based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with T. de Rooij. T. de Rooij is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Lieveld, Arthur, Nine de Graaf, Ruud S. Kootte, et al.. (2021). Predicting poor outcome in patients with suspected COVID-19 presenting to the Emergency Department (COVERED) – Development, internal and external validation of a prediction model. Acute Medicine Journal. 20(1). 4–14. 3 indexed citations
2.
Besselink, Marc G., Sjors Klompmaker, T. de Rooij, et al.. (2020). Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy reduces major morbidity and length of stay compared to the open approach: an international validation. HPB. 22. S345–S345. 1 indexed citations
3.
Korrel, Maarten, Frederique L. Vissers, Jony van Hilst, et al.. (2020). Minimally Invasive versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of Two Randomized Controlled Trials. Pancreatology. 20. S186–S186. 2 indexed citations
4.
Hilst, Jony van, T. de Rooij, Michael F. Gerhards, et al.. (2018). Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy (LEOPARD-2): a multicenter patient-blinded, randomized controlled trial. HPB. 20. S217–S217. 1 indexed citations
5.
Festen, Sebastiaan, T. de Rooij, O.R. Busch, et al.. (2016). Laparoscopic modified blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy using a unidirectional barbed suture after pancreatoduodenectomy. HPB. 18. e800–e801. 1 indexed citations
6.
Klompmaker, Sjors, T. de Rooij, Justine Korteweg, et al.. (2016). Systematic review of outcomes after distal pancreatectomy with coeliac axis resection for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. British journal of surgery. 103(8). 941–949. 62 indexed citations
7.
Rooij, T. de, et al.. (2016). Intraobserver and Interobserver Agreement of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Reparability of Peripheral Meniscal Tears: What Criteria Really Matter?. The Journal of Knee Surgery. 30(3). 276–282. 2 indexed citations
8.
Hilal, Mohammad Abu, et al.. (2015). Laparoscopic radical ‘no-touch’ left pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: technique and results. Surgical Endoscopy. 30(9). 3830–3838. 33 indexed citations
9.
Rooij, T. de, Robert Sitarz, Olivier R. Busch, Marc G. Besselink, & Mohammad Abu Hilal. (2015). Technical Aspects of Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy for Benign and Malignant Disease: Review of the Literature. Gastroenterology Research and Practice. 2015. 1–9. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026