T D Petes

1.4k total citations
10 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

T D Petes is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics and Cancer Research. According to data from OpenAlex, T D Petes has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Molecular Biology, 3 papers in Genetics and 2 papers in Cancer Research. Recurrent topics in T D Petes's work include DNA Repair Mechanisms (8 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (7 papers) and DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (3 papers). T D Petes is often cited by papers focused on DNA Repair Mechanisms (8 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (7 papers) and DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (3 papers). T D Petes collaborates with scholars based in United States. T D Petes's co-authors include Robert H. Schiestl, Charles W. L. Hill, Sue Jinks-Robertson, Peter J. Detloff, Michael A. White, Micheline K. Strand, Gray F. Crouse, Timothy J. Zamb and Dilip K. Nag and has published in prestigious journals such as Cell, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Molecular and Cellular Biology.

In The Last Decade

T D Petes

9 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
T D Petes United States	9	998	377	200	124	110	10	1.2k
Elaine A. Sia United States	18	921 0.9×	138 0.4×	202 1.0×	253 2.0×	56 0.5×	26	1.1k
Guy‐Franck Richard France	23	1.5k 1.5×	483 1.3×	295 1.5×	49 0.4×	106 1.0×	50	1.8k
Maarten H. Stuiver Netherlands	16	906 0.9×	470 1.2×	250 1.3×	22 0.2×	83 0.8×	19	1.3k
Margaret Dominska United States	23	1.7k 1.7×	510 1.4×	474 2.4×	305 2.5×	141 1.3×	35	2.0k
Carolyn McGill United States	17	1.8k 1.8×	291 0.8×	333 1.7×	32 0.3×	188 1.7×	20	2.0k
Gary Daubresse United States	8	966 1.0×	158 0.4×	169 0.8×	69 0.6×	20 0.2×	8	1.0k
Hiep T. Tran United States	17	1.3k 1.3×	183 0.5×	234 1.2×	469 3.8×	69 0.6×	18	1.5k
David B. Kaback United States	28	2.1k 2.1×	501 1.3×	321 1.6×	18 0.1×	272 2.5×	58	2.3k
David T. Kirkpatrick United States	16	685 0.7×	140 0.4×	114 0.6×	109 0.9×	128 1.2×	29	861
Dilip K. Nag United States	17	781 0.8×	180 0.5×	149 0.7×	36 0.3×	139 1.3×	33	959

Countries citing papers authored by T D Petes

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T D Petes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T D Petes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T D Petes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T D Petes

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T D Petes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T D Petes. The network helps show where T D Petes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of T D Petes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T D Petes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T D Petes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with T D Petes. T D Petes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Petes, T D, et al.. (2020). Physical detection of heteroduplexes during meiotic recombination in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.. UNC Libraries.

2.

Strand, Micheline K., et al.. (1995). Mutations in the MSH3 gene preferentially lead to deletions within tracts of simple repetitive DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 92(22). 10418–10421. 121 indexed citations

3.

Detloff, Peter J., Michael A. White, & T D Petes. (1992). Analysis of a gene conversion gradient at the HIS4 locus in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.. Genetics. 132(1). 113–123. 112 indexed citations

4.

Schiestl, Robert H. & T D Petes. (1991). Integration of DNA fragments by illegitimate recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 88(17). 7585–7589. 267 indexed citations

5.

Nag, Dilip K. & T D Petes. (1990). Genetic evidence for preferential strand transfer during meiotic recombination in yeast.. Genetics. 125(4). 753–761. 26 indexed citations

6.

Nag, Dilip K. & T D Petes. (1990). Meiotic recombination between dispersed repeated genes is associated with heteroduplex formation.. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 10(8). 4420–4423. 14 indexed citations

7.

Petes, T D & Charles W. L. Hill. (1988). RECOMBINATION BETWEEN REPEATED GENES IN MICROORGANISMS. Annual Review of Genetics. 22(1). 147–168. 221 indexed citations

8.

Jinks-Robertson, Sue & T D Petes. (1985). High-frequency meiotic gene conversion between repeated genes on nonhomologous chromosomes in yeast.. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 82(10). 3350–3354. 100 indexed citations

9.

Zamb, Timothy J. & T D Petes. (1981). Unequal sister-strand recombination within yeast ribosomal DNA does not require the RAD 52 gene product. Current Genetics. 3(2). 125–132. 40 indexed citations

10.

Petes, T D. (1980). Unequal meiotic recombination within tandem arrays of yeast ribosomal DNA genes. Cell. 19(3). 765–774. 302 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact