T. Cos

1.1k total citations
28 papers, 789 citations indexed

About

T. Cos is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, T. Cos has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 789 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 10 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 7 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in T. Cos's work include Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (13 papers), Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (10 papers) and Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (7 papers). T. Cos is often cited by papers focused on Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (13 papers), Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (10 papers) and Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (7 papers). T. Cos collaborates with scholars based in Belgium, Spain and France. T. Cos's co-authors include Jacques Jani, Mieke Cannie, César Roncero, Ángel Durán, Xin Kang, Carmela Votino, Walter Foulon, Veerle Segers, Anne Massez and Marie Cassart and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Radiology and European Journal of Biochemistry.

In The Last Decade

T. Cos

28 papers receiving 771 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
T. Cos Belgium 16 291 264 172 169 152 28 789
Lothar Schrod Germany 15 29 0.1× 85 0.3× 183 1.1× 60 0.4× 71 0.5× 33 537
Otília Brandão Portugal 12 35 0.1× 229 0.9× 52 0.3× 99 0.6× 66 0.4× 34 388
Michael Eckstein United Kingdom 12 440 1.5× 211 0.8× 234 1.4× 24 0.1× 80 0.5× 15 787
B Foot United Kingdom 18 261 0.9× 16 0.1× 83 0.5× 161 1.0× 36 0.2× 27 991
Theodor Zimmermann Germany 15 118 0.4× 11 0.0× 111 0.6× 193 1.1× 133 0.9× 36 766
A K Haque United States 15 20 0.1× 46 0.2× 166 1.0× 48 0.3× 100 0.7× 19 484
Douglass B. Clayton United States 17 26 0.1× 307 1.2× 132 0.8× 190 1.1× 113 0.7× 57 782
Jan M. van Lith Netherlands 11 21 0.1× 304 1.2× 114 0.7× 75 0.4× 14 0.1× 18 624
Benjamin J. Lee United States 12 39 0.1× 40 0.2× 121 0.7× 47 0.3× 98 0.6× 45 565
Joana Chakraborty United States 11 32 0.1× 30 0.1× 55 0.3× 60 0.4× 98 0.6× 21 443

Countries citing papers authored by T. Cos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T. Cos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. Cos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. Cos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T. Cos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. Cos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. Cos. The network helps show where T. Cos may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of T. Cos

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T. Cos. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T. Cos based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with T. Cos. T. Cos is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Garofalo, G., T. Cos, Julie Désir, et al.. (2021). A prenatal case of lissencephaly with cerebellar hypoplasia: New mutation in RELN gene. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 9(12). e04882–e04882. 2 indexed citations
2.
3.
Cannie, Mieke, Roland Devlieger, Filip Claus, et al.. (2016). Congenital cytomegalovirus infection: contribution and best timing of prenatal MR imaging. European Radiology. 26(10). 3760–3769. 61 indexed citations
4.
Hennes, Aurélie, Léonardo Gucciardo, Silvia Zia, et al.. (2015). Safe and effective cryopreservation methods for long‐term storage of human‐amniotic‐fluid‐derived stem cells. Prenatal Diagnosis. 35(5). 456–462. 15 indexed citations
5.
Votino, Carmela, et al.. (2014). OC19.04: Ultrasonographic factors predicting a poor outcome in pregnancies between 8 and 10 + 6 week's gestation. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 44(S1). 44–45. 2 indexed citations
6.
Verhoye, Marleen, Carmela Votino, Mieke Cannie, et al.. (2013). Post-mortem high-field magnetic resonance imaging: effect or various factors. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 26(11). 1060–1065. 12 indexed citations
7.
Votino, Carmela, et al.. (2013). Use of spatiotemporal image correlation at 11–14 weeks' gestation. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 42(6). 669–678. 22 indexed citations
8.
Cannie, Mieke, Carmela Votino, Philippe Moerman, et al.. (2012). Acceptance, Reliability and Confidence of Diagnosis of Fetal and Neonatal Virtuopsy Compared With Conventional Autopsy. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 67(10). 615–617. 2 indexed citations
9.
Votino, Carmela, Jacques Jani, Marleen Verhoye, et al.. (2012). Postmortem examination of human fetal hearts at or below 20 weeks' gestation: a comparison of high‐field MRI at 9.4 T with lower‐field MRI magnets and stereomicroscopic autopsy. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 40(4). 437–444. 47 indexed citations
10.
Votino, Carmela, Marleen Verhoye, Veerle Segers, et al.. (2012). Fetal organ weight estimation by postmortem high‐field magnetic resonance imaging before 20 weeks' gestation. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 39(6). 673–678. 16 indexed citations
11.
Votino, Carmela, Jacques Jani, Marleen Verhoye, et al.. (2012). OP26.01: Post‐mortem examination of fetal heart in the first half of the pregnancy: a comparison of high‐field MRI at 9.4 T to lower‐field MRI and to autopsy. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 40(S1). 132–132. 1 indexed citations
12.
Votino, Carmela, Veerle Segers, Hugues Dessy, et al.. (2012). Virtual autopsy by computed tomographic angiography of the fetal heart: a feasibility study. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 39(6). 679–684. 32 indexed citations
13.
Votino, Carmela, Jacques Jani, Nasroolla Damry, et al.. (2011). Magnetic resonance imaging in the normal fetal heart and in congenital heart disease. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 39(3). 322–329. 31 indexed citations
14.
15.
Cannie, Mieke, Carmela Votino, Ph. Moerman, et al.. (2011). Acceptance, reliability and confidence of diagnosis of fetal and neonatal virtuopsy compared with conventional autopsy: a prospective study. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 39(6). 659–665. 78 indexed citations
16.
Cassart, Marie, Anne Massez, T. Cos, et al.. (2007). Contribution of three‐dimensional computed tomography in the assessment of fetal skeletal dysplasia. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 29(5). 537–543. 66 indexed citations
17.
Avni, Fred E., T. Cos, Marie Cassart, et al.. (2006). Evolution of fetal ultrasonography. European Radiology. 17(2). 419–431. 20 indexed citations
18.
Peralta, Cleisson Fábio Andrioli, Jacques Jani, T. Cos, K. H. Nicolaides, & Jan Deprest. (2006). Left and right lung volumes in fetuses with diaphragmatic hernia. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 27(5). 551–554. 49 indexed citations
19.
Dueñas, Encarnación, et al.. (1999). Generation of null alleles for the functional analysis of six genes from the right arm ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae chromosome II. Yeast. 15(7). 615–623. 4 indexed citations
20.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lothar Schrod Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Otília Brandão Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Michael Eckstein Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by B Foot Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Theodor Zimmermann Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by A K Haque Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Douglass B. Clayton Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jan M. van Lith Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Benjamin J. Lee Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Joana Chakraborty
Rankless by CCL
2026