T. C. A. Anant
- Economics and Econometrics top 2%
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance top 5%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Management of Technology and Innovation top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations
- Topics
- Politics, Economics, and Education Policy (2 papers)Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (2 papers)Water resources management and optimization (2 papers)
- Cited by
- General Economics, Econometrics and FinanceEconomics and EconometricsManagement of Technology and Innovation
- Partner nations
- IndiaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
T. C. A. Anant
5 papers receiving 380 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
- Economics and Econometrics 393
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 162
- Strategy and Management 60
- Management of Technology and Innovation 53
- Political Science and International Relations 27
Countries citing papers authored by T. C. A. Anant
This map shows the geographic impact of T. C. A. Anant's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. C. A. Anant with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. C. A. Anant more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by T. C. A. Anant
This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. C. A. Anant. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. C. A. Anant. The network helps show where T. C. A. Anant may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of T. C. A. Anant
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T. C. A. Anant. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T. C. A. Anant based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with T. C. A. Anant. T. C. A. Anant is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | An Economic Analysis of Judicial Activism | 0 |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | Employment and labour in south Asia | 2 |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | A Schumpeterian Model of the Product Life Cycle | 408 |
| 6 | Dynamic Optimization with a Non-Convex Technology | 0 |
| 7 | 4 |
About T. C. A. Anant
T. C. A. Anant is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Ocean Engineering and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 7 papers that have together received 427 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Politics, Economics, and Education Policy (2 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (2 papers) and Water resources management and optimization (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (162 citations), Economics and Econometrics (393 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (53 citations). T. C. A. Anant has collaborated with scholars based in India, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Elias Dinopoulos, Paul S. Segerstrom, Kaushik Basu, Ajit Mishra and Sunil Sharma. Their work appears in journals such as American Economic Review, Journal of Development Economics and Journal of Public Economics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.