T. Brecht

1.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
10 papers, 775 citations indexed

About

T. Brecht is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, T. Brecht has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 775 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 4 papers in Condensed Matter Physics and 4 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in T. Brecht's work include Quantum and electron transport phenomena (6 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (4 papers) and Quantum Information and Cryptography (4 papers). T. Brecht is often cited by papers focused on Quantum and electron transport phenomena (6 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (4 papers) and Quantum Information and Cryptography (4 papers). T. Brecht collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and France. T. Brecht's co-authors include Luigi Frunzio, Michel Devoret, Chen Wang, Robert Schoelkopf, Yiwen Chu, Yvonne Y. Gao, Christopher Axline, R. J. Schoelkopf, Wolfgang Pfaff and Katrina Sliwa and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Physical Review Letters and Nature Communications.

In The Last Decade

T. Brecht

10 papers receiving 757 citations

Hit Papers

Surface participation and dielectric loss in superconduct... 2015 2026 2018 2022 2015 50 100 150

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
T. Brecht United States 8 658 468 168 167 67 10 775
Clemens Müller Germany 21 864 1.3× 628 1.3× 231 1.4× 145 0.9× 30 0.4× 35 1.0k
C. Neill United States 7 1.0k 1.5× 882 1.9× 184 1.1× 146 0.9× 71 1.1× 11 1.2k
Luke Burkhart United States 9 587 0.9× 468 1.0× 109 0.6× 79 0.5× 43 0.6× 10 676
Lafe Spietz United States 10 619 0.9× 368 0.8× 234 1.4× 92 0.6× 46 0.7× 19 713
A. Cavanna France 10 938 1.4× 393 0.8× 443 2.6× 89 0.5× 60 0.9× 14 1.0k
Bethany M. Niedzielski United States 17 726 1.1× 411 0.9× 118 0.7× 326 2.0× 19 0.3× 35 922
R. Shaikhaidarov United Kingdom 14 424 0.6× 150 0.3× 133 0.8× 210 1.3× 47 0.7× 35 555
Ofer Naaman United States 13 452 0.7× 197 0.4× 144 0.9× 179 1.1× 28 0.4× 25 552
Lukas Grünhaupt Germany 13 459 0.7× 182 0.4× 107 0.6× 253 1.5× 104 1.6× 17 565

Countries citing papers authored by T. Brecht

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T. Brecht's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. Brecht with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. Brecht more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T. Brecht

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. Brecht. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. Brecht. The network helps show where T. Brecht may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of T. Brecht

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T. Brecht. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T. Brecht based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with T. Brecht. T. Brecht is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Catelani, Gianluigi, K. Li, Christopher Axline, et al.. (2022). Ac losses in field-cooled type I superconducting cavities. Superconductor Science and Technology. 35(6). 65016–65016. 2 indexed citations
2.
Chen, Edward H., Andrew Pan, Andrey A. Kiselev, et al.. (2021). Detuning Axis Pulsed Spectroscopy of Valley-Orbital States in Si/Si-Ge Quantum Dots. Physical Review Applied. 15(4). 31 indexed citations
3.
Brecht, T., Yiwen Chu, Christopher Axline, et al.. (2017). Micromachined Integrated Quantum Circuit Containing a Superconducting Qubit. Physical Review Applied. 7(4). 16 indexed citations
4.
Brecht, T., Wolfgang Pfaff, Chen Wang, et al.. (2016). Multilayer microwave integrated quantum circuits for scalable quantum computing. npj Quantum Information. 2(1). 100 indexed citations
5.
Brecht, T., Matthew J. Reagor, Yiwen Chu, et al.. (2015). Demonstration of superconducting micromachined cavities. Applied Physics Letters. 107(19). 42 indexed citations
6.
Wang, Chen, Christopher Axline, Yvonne Y. Gao, et al.. (2015). Surface participation and dielectric loss in superconducting qubits. Applied Physics Letters. 107(16). 178 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Wang, Chen, Yvonne Y. Gao, Ioan M. Pop, et al.. (2014). Measurement and control of quasiparticle dynamics in a superconducting qubit. Nature Communications. 5(1). 5836–5836. 133 indexed citations
8.
Vool, Uri, Ioan M. Pop, Katrina Sliwa, et al.. (2014). Non-Poissonian Quantum Jumps of a Fluxonium Qubit due to Quasiparticle Excitations. Physical Review Letters. 113(24). 247001–247001. 90 indexed citations
9.
Paik, Hanhee, Gianluigi Catelani, Lihui Sun, et al.. (2013). Ten Milliseconds for Aluminum Cavities in the Quantum Regime. arXiv (Cornell University). 1 indexed citations
10.
Hatridge, Michael, Shyam Shankar, Mazyar Mirrahimi, et al.. (2013). Quantum Back-Action of an Individual Variable-Strength Measurement. Science. 339(6116). 178–181. 182 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026