T. Beth

2.1k citations
47 papers · 1.0k indexed · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

T. Beth

42 papers receiving 956 citations

Peers

T. Beth
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Artificial Intelligence 837
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 450
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 179
  • Information Systems 164
  • Computational Mathematics 3
Replace Miklós Sántha with:
Miklós Sántha France
P. Oscar Boykin United States
Martin Rötteler United States
Amnon Ta‐Shma Israel
Jacques Calmet Germany
Iordanis Kerenidis France
Vojtěch Havlíček Czechia
Ryutaroh Matsumoto Japan
Jinjing Shi China
Gianpiero Cattaneo Italy
T. Beth relative to Miklós Sántha France Miklós Sántha's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Miklós Sántha · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by T. Beth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T. Beth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. Beth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. Beth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T. Beth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. Beth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. Beth. The network helps show where T. Beth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside T. Beth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with T. Beth Line = papers co-authored together T. Beth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997219
2 2002202
3 2002122
4 198974
5 200556
6 199343
7 200435
8 200134
9 200231
10 200228
11 200315
12 200315
13 199813
14 199610
15 200010
16 200410
17 19989
18 20069
19 20059
20 20028

About T. Beth

T. Beth is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Computer Networks and Communications and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (18 papers), Coding theory and cryptography (14 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (13 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (10 papers), Error Correcting Code Techniques (6 papers), Quantum-Dot Cellular Automata (5 papers), Advanced Wireless Communication Techniques (4 papers) and graph theory and CDMA systems (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Artificial Intelligence (837 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (450 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (179 citations), Information Systems (164 citations) and Computational Mathematics (3 citations). T. Beth has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Markus Grassl, T. Pellizzari, G. Alber, Paweł Wocjan, Raphael Yahalom, Michał Horodecki, Dominik Janzing, Martin Rötteler, Gordon B. Agnew and R. C. Mullin. Their work appears in journals such as Quantum Information and Computation, Physical Review A, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications and Physical Review Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact