Sven Jonuscheit

577 total citations
34 papers, 411 citations indexed

About

Sven Jonuscheit is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Ophthalmology and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Sven Jonuscheit has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 411 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 20 papers in Ophthalmology and 11 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Sven Jonuscheit's work include Corneal surgery and disorders (20 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (16 papers) and Corneal Surgery and Treatments (13 papers). Sven Jonuscheit is often cited by papers focused on Corneal surgery and disorders (20 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (16 papers) and Corneal Surgery and Treatments (13 papers). Sven Jonuscheit collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and United States. Sven Jonuscheit's co-authors include Michael J. Doughty, Kanna Ramaesh, Pauline Campbell, Raúl Martín, Peter Langhorne, Alex Pollock, Christine Hazelton, Clair A Henderson, Jayne Angilley and Fiona J. Rowe and has published in prestigious journals such as Stroke, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.

In The Last Decade

Sven Jonuscheit

32 papers receiving 396 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sven Jonuscheit United Kingdom 13 291 262 152 105 38 34 411
Tanuj Dada India 13 345 1.2× 490 1.9× 64 0.4× 78 0.7× 8 0.2× 34 619
Shay Ofir Israel 8 141 0.5× 185 0.7× 89 0.6× 29 0.3× 22 0.6× 21 274
Himal Kandel Australia 17 689 2.4× 525 2.0× 554 3.6× 342 3.3× 42 1.1× 57 981
Hurshell H. Hunt United States 10 152 0.5× 249 1.0× 52 0.3× 72 0.7× 51 1.3× 20 367
Masoud Khorrami‐Nejad Iran 10 138 0.5× 148 0.6× 116 0.8× 56 0.5× 21 0.6× 69 305
Meri Vukicevic Australia 11 190 0.7× 301 1.1× 90 0.6× 8 0.1× 80 2.1× 30 415
Undraa Altangerel United States 9 296 1.0× 392 1.5× 132 0.9× 14 0.1× 24 0.6× 14 428
David Newsham United Kingdom 11 105 0.4× 212 0.8× 252 1.7× 28 0.3× 124 3.3× 24 379
Yazan Gammoh Jordan 6 139 0.5× 146 0.6× 116 0.8× 39 0.4× 17 0.4× 19 257
María Carmen Sánchez‐González Spain 11 182 0.6× 144 0.5× 103 0.7× 133 1.3× 26 0.7× 48 337

Countries citing papers authored by Sven Jonuscheit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sven Jonuscheit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sven Jonuscheit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sven Jonuscheit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sven Jonuscheit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sven Jonuscheit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sven Jonuscheit. The network helps show where Sven Jonuscheit may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sven Jonuscheit

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sven Jonuscheit. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sven Jonuscheit based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sven Jonuscheit. Sven Jonuscheit is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Strang, Niall C., et al.. (2025). Barriers to accessing eye care in Pakistan: a mixed methods study. Primary Health Care Research & Development. 26. e58–e58.
2.
Strang, Niall C., et al.. (2024). Topical review: Task shifting and the recruitment and retention of eye health workers in underserved areas. Optometry and Vision Science. 101(3). 143–150. 2 indexed citations
3.
Strang, Niall C., et al.. (2022). Exploring eye care pathways, patient priorities and economics in Pakistan: A scoping review and expert consultation study with thematic analysis. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 42(4). 694–716. 7 indexed citations
4.
Mallen, Edward A. H., et al.. (2021). The role of peripheral ocular length and peripheral corneal radius of curvature in determining refractive error. Journal of Optometry. 15(2). 129–137. 4 indexed citations
6.
7.
Jonuscheit, Sven, Andrew Lam, Katrina L. Schmid, et al.. (2020). COVID‐19: ensuring safe clinical teaching at university optometry schools. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 41(1). 144–156. 9 indexed citations
8.
Jonuscheit, Sven, et al.. (2019). <p>Patient-reported severity of dry eye and quality of life in diabetes</p>. Clinical ophthalmology. Volume 13. 217–224. 29 indexed citations
9.
Doughty, Michael J. & Sven Jonuscheit. (2018). Corneal structure, transparency, thickness and optical density (densitometry), especially as relevant to contact lens wear—a review. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye. 42(3). 238–245. 20 indexed citations
10.
Geue, Claudia & Sven Jonuscheit. (2017). Effect of individual-level and socioeconomic factors on long-term survival after cataract surgery over a 30-year period. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 43(4). 537–542.
11.
Jonuscheit, Sven, et al.. (2016). Relationship between Corneal Thickness and Radius to Body Height. Optometry and Vision Science. 94(3). 380–386. 8 indexed citations
12.
Martín, Raúl, et al.. (2015). Repeatability of Pentacam peripheral corneal thickness measurements. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye. 38(6). 424–429. 16 indexed citations
13.
Jonuscheit, Sven, et al.. (2014). Peripheral nasal‐temporal corneal asymmetry in relation to corneal thickness: a Scheimpflug imaging study. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 35(1). 45–51. 7 indexed citations
14.
Jonuscheit, Sven. (2014). Data extraction and reporting strategies of studies assessing non-central corneal thickness by Pentacam: A review. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye. 37(5). 323–330. 12 indexed citations
15.
Jonuscheit, Sven, Michael J. Doughty, & Kanna Ramaesh. (2013). The corneal endothelium after keratoplasty for keratoconus. Clinical and Experimental Optometry. 96(2). 201–207. 4 indexed citations
16.
Jonuscheit, Sven, et al.. (2013). Body mass index, peripheral corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth in young European adults - A pilot study. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 54(15). 524–524. 1 indexed citations
17.
Jonuscheit, Sven & Michael J. Doughty. (2009). Discrepancy between central and midperipheral corneal thickness measurements obtained with slit-scanning pachymetry and noncontact specular microscopy. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 35(12). 2127–2135. 12 indexed citations
18.
Jonuscheit, Sven & Michael J. Doughty. (2008). Repeatability of Central Corneal Thickness Measures by Orbscan Pachymetry for Right and Left Eyes. Eye & Contact Lens Science & Clinical Practice. 35(1). 20–25. 16 indexed citations
19.
Jonuscheit, Sven & Michael J. Doughty. (2007). Regional Repeatability Measures of Corneal Thickness: Orbscan II and Ultrasound. Optometry and Vision Science. 84(1). 52–58. 32 indexed citations
20.
Jonuscheit, Sven, Michael J. Doughty, & Norman F. Button. (2007). On the use of Orbscan II to assess the peripheral corneal thickness in humans: a comparison with ultrasound pachometry measures *. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 27(2). 179–189. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026