Susana Searle
- Surgery
- Rehabilitation top 5%
- Epidemiology
- Dermatology top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Co-authors
- Stefan DanillaWilfredo CalderónDeborah F. SmithAnneliese SpinksJason WasiakHeather ClelandEduardo MachucaCarmen Gloria Morovic
- Topics
- Surgical Simulation and Training (7 papers)Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (5 papers)Wound Healing and Treatments (4 papers)
- Cited by
- RehabilitationDermatologySurgery
- Partner nations
- ChileUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Susana Searle
25 papers receiving 320 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Surgery 222
- Rehabilitation 144
- Epidemiology 59
- Dermatology 49
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 38
Countries citing papers authored by Susana Searle
This map shows the geographic impact of Susana Searle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Susana Searle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Susana Searle more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Susana Searle
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Susana Searle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Susana Searle. The network helps show where Susana Searle may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Susana Searle
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Susana Searle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Susana Searle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Susana Searle. Susana Searle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 32 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 27 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | Postoperative pain in suction assited lipoplasty versus laser lipolisis. Comparative prospective study Comparación del dolor secundario a lipoaspiración tradicional versus lipolisis láser. Estudio prospectivo | 1 |
| 19 | 186 | |
| 20 | 18 |
About Susana Searle
Susana Searle is a scholar working on Dermatology, Medical Laboratory Technology and Rehabilitation, having authored 26 papers that have together received 332 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Surgical Simulation and Training (7 papers), Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (5 papers) and Wound Healing and Treatments (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (144 citations), Dermatology (49 citations) and Surgery (222 citations). Susana Searle has collaborated with scholars based in Chile, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Stefan Danilla, Wilfredo Calderón, Deborah F. Smith, Anneliese Spinks, Jason Wasiak, Heather Cleland, Eduardo Machuca, Carmen Gloria Morovic, Gonzalo Yáñez and Ignacio Méndez. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Surgery, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery and Surgical Endoscopy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.