Susan M. Love

4.0k total citations
78 papers, 2.8k citations indexed

About

Susan M. Love is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Oncology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Susan M. Love has authored 78 papers receiving a total of 2.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 35 papers in Cancer Research, 33 papers in Oncology and 21 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in Susan M. Love's work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (33 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (18 papers) and Breast Implant and Reconstruction (9 papers). Susan M. Love is often cited by papers focused on Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (33 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (18 papers) and Breast Implant and Reconstruction (9 papers). Susan M. Love collaborates with scholars based in United States, India and United Kingdom. Susan M. Love's co-authors include Jay R. Harris, Sanford H. Barsky, Abram Recht, Rebecca Gelman, Barbara Silver, James L. Connolly, Stuart J. Schnitt, Robert T. Osteen, Blake Cady and Sumner A. Slavin and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet and JAMA.

In The Last Decade

Susan M. Love

73 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Susan M. Love United States	26	1.8k	1.3k	879	863	310	78	2.8k
Susan K. Boolbol United States	23	1.6k 0.9×	1.2k 0.9×	820 0.9×	985 1.1×	340 1.1×	71	2.8k
Theodore N. Tsangaris United States	29	1.6k 0.9×	972 0.7×	1.5k 1.7×	697 0.8×	574 1.9×	65	3.3k
Riccardo Masetti Italy	27	1.1k 0.6×	497 0.4×	1.0k 1.2×	955 1.1×	390 1.3×	166	2.5k
Richard J. Bleicher United States	26	1.2k 0.6×	507 0.4×	535 0.6×	1.6k 1.8×	440 1.4×	112	3.0k
Angel Arnaout Canada	20	1.1k 0.6×	674 0.5×	638 0.7×	951 1.1×	428 1.4×	93	2.2k
Elizabeth Saffer United States	20	1.8k 1.0×	885 0.7×	939 1.1×	1.6k 1.9×	245 0.8×	40	3.4k
Margaret M. Steinhoff United States	34	953 0.5×	545 0.4×	959 1.1×	1.0k 1.2×	874 2.8×	77	3.9k
Melissa E. Hughes United States	30	2.0k 1.1×	536 0.4×	443 0.5×	2.2k 2.6×	462 1.5×	103	3.5k
F. Dravet France	23	610 0.3×	409 0.3×	806 0.9×	662 0.8×	283 0.9×	72	1.6k
Marjolein L. Smidt Netherlands	40	2.3k 1.3×	1.6k 1.2×	943 1.1×	1.1k 1.3×	383 1.2×	140	4.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Susan M. Love

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Susan M. Love's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Susan M. Love with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Susan M. Love more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Susan M. Love

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Susan M. Love. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Susan M. Love. The network helps show where Susan M. Love may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Susan M. Love

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Susan M. Love. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Susan M. Love based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Susan M. Love. Susan M. Love is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Heng, Yujing J., et al.. (2022). The association of infectious mononucleosis and invasive breast cancer in The Health of Women (HOW) Study®. Breast Cancer. 29(4). 731–739. 5 indexed citations

Guida, Jennifer, et al.. (2022). The Health of Women (HOW) Study®: a web-based survey of breast cancer risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. Journal of Cancer Survivorship. 17(5). 1445–1451. 1 indexed citations

Williamson, Timothy J., et al.. (2018). Metastatic Breast Cancer Collateral Damage Project (MBCCD): Scale development and preliminary results of the Survey of Health, Impact, Needs, and Experiences (SHINE). Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 171(1). 75–84. 9 indexed citations

Nguyen, Tinh Thi, Janice M. Pogoda, Jianyu Rao, et al.. (2016). Examination of Duct Physiology in the Human Mammary Gland. PLoS ONE. 11(4). e0150653–e0150653. 4 indexed citations

Chan, Alfred A., Mina Bashir, Magali Noval Rivas, et al.. (2016). Characterization of the microbiome of nipple aspirate fluid of breast cancer survivors. Scientific Reports. 6(1). 28061–28061. 171 indexed citations

Love, Richard R. & Susan M. Love. (2016). Peri-operative biology in primary breast cancer: a credible therapeutic target. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 156(3). 411–413. 2 indexed citations

Love, Susan M., et al.. (2015). The 8th international symposium on the breast: Using next-generation science to understand the normal breast and the development of breast cancer- conference report. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 154(3). 617–621. 1 indexed citations

Rao, Jian Yu, et al.. (2013). Intraductal Therapy of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Presurgery Study. Clinical Breast Cancer. 13(4). 280–286. 21 indexed citations

Kehoe, Patrick G., et al.. (2011). LRP-1-mediated uptake of A beta by cerebrovascular smooth muscle cells: relationship to cytotoxicity. Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology. 37. 10–10. 1 indexed citations

10.

Love, Susan M., et al.. (2008). Technical Enhancements to Breast Ductal Lavage. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 15(10). 2734–2738. 13 indexed citations

11.

King, Bonnie L. & Susan M. Love. (2006). The intraductal approach to the breast: raison d'être. Breast Cancer Research. 8(2). 206–206. 32 indexed citations

12.

King, Bonnie L., et al.. (2005). The Fourth International Symposium on the Intraductal Approach to Breast Cancer, Santa Barbara, California, 10–13 March 2005. Breast Cancer Research. 7(5). 198–204. 10 indexed citations

13.

Love, Susan M. & Sanford H. Barsky. (2004). Anatomy of the nipple and breast ducts revisited. Cancer. 101(9). 1947–1957. 106 indexed citations

14.

Barsky, Sanford H., et al.. (1997). ‘Revertant’ DCIS in human axillary breast carcinoma metastases. The Journal of Pathology. 183(2). 188–194. 35 indexed citations

15.

Nguyen, Mai Thanh Thi, Marie M. McCombs, Andrea Kim, et al.. (1996). An update on core needle biopsy for radiologically detected breast lesions. Cancer. 78(11). 2340–2345. 3 indexed citations

16.

Nguyen, Mai, Marie M. McCombs, Andrea Kim, et al.. (1996). An update on core needle biopsy for radiologically detected breast lesions. Cancer. 78(11). 2340–2345. 68 indexed citations

17.

Love, Susan M., et al.. (1996). Atlas of Techniques in Breast Surgery. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 3 indexed citations

18.

Schnitt, Stuart J., James A. Hayman, Rebecca Gelman, et al.. (1996). A prospective study of conservative surgery alone in the treatment of selected patients with stage I breast cancer. Cancer. 77(6). 1094–1100. 8 indexed citations

19.

Bornstein, Bruce A., Abram Recht, J L Connolly, et al.. (1991). Results of treating ductal carcinomaIn situ of the breast with conservative surgery and radiation therapy. Cancer. 67(1). 7–13. 90 indexed citations

20.

Recht, Abram, James L. Connolly, Stuart J. Schnitt, et al.. (1986). Conservative surgery and radiation therapy for early breast cancer: results, controversies, and unsolved problems.. PubMed. 13(4). 434–49. 62 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact