This map shows the geographic impact of Surveys's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Surveys with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Surveys more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Surveys. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Surveys. The network helps show where Surveys may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Surveys
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Surveys.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Surveys based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Surveys. Surveys is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Swerdlow, Anthony J., Isabel dos‐Santos‐Silva, & Surveys. (1994). Atlas of Cancer Incidence in England and Wales 1968-85: Based on data from the cancer registries of England and Wales, with the cooperation of the Office of Population Censuses and Surveys.3 indexed citations
2.
Surveys, et al.. (1993). Ethnic group and country of birth, Great Britain. HMSO eBooks.7 indexed citations
3.
Surveys. (1992). Department of Health and Office of Population, Censuses and Surveys : Departmental report : the Government's expenditure plans 1992-93 to 1994-95. HMSO eBooks.3 indexed citations
4.
Surveys. (1991). Social classifications and coding methodology. HMSO eBooks.28 indexed citations
5.
Surveys, et al.. (1991). The government social survey : a history. HMSO eBooks.7 indexed citations
6.
Surveys. (1990). Structure and definition of major, minor, and unit groups. HMSO eBooks.10 indexed citations
7.
Surveys, et al.. (1990). Morbidity statistics from general practice 1981-82 : third national study : socio-economic analyses, microfiche. HMSO eBooks.1 indexed citations
Surveys. (1987). Marriage and divorce statistics : Review of the Registrar General on marriages and divorces in England and Wales. HMSO eBooks.1 indexed citations
10.
Todd, J. E., J. E. T. Eldridge, & Surveys. (1987). Electoral registration in inner city areas, 1983-1984 : a survey carried out by Social Survey Division of OPCS on behalf of the Home Office. HMSO eBooks.2 indexed citations
11.
Surveys, et al.. (1984). Key statistics for local authorities, Great Britain. HMSO eBooks.1 indexed citations
12.
Surveys, et al.. (1984). Key statistics for urban areas. HMSO eBooks.4 indexed citations
13.
Surveys, et al.. (1983). Country of birth : Great Britain. HMSO eBooks.3 indexed citations
14.
Goldblatt, Peter, et al.. (1982). Longitudinal study : socio-demographic mortality differentials : a first report on mortality in 1971-1975 according to 1971 census characteristics, based on data collected in the OPCS Longitudinal Study.24 indexed citations
15.
Draper, G J & Surveys. (1982). Childhood cancer in Britain : incidence, survival, and mortality. HMSO eBooks.23 indexed citations
Surveys, et al.. (1980). People in Britain : a census atlas. HMSO eBooks.14 indexed citations
18.
Surveys. (1978). Birth statistics : Review of the Registrar General on births and patterns of family building in England and Wales. HMSO eBooks.77 indexed citations
19.
Surveys, et al.. (1977). Guide to census reports, Great Britain, 1801-1966. HMSO eBooks.6 indexed citations
20.
Surveys, et al.. (1972). Census 1971, Great Britain : advance analysis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.