Countries citing papers authored by Suranjan Chakraborty
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Suranjan Chakraborty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Suranjan Chakraborty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Suranjan Chakraborty more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Suranjan Chakraborty
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Suranjan Chakraborty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Suranjan Chakraborty. The network helps show where Suranjan Chakraborty may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Suranjan Chakraborty
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Suranjan Chakraborty.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Suranjan Chakraborty based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Suranjan Chakraborty. Suranjan Chakraborty is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Chakraborty, Suranjan, et al.. (2021). Using Recurrent Neural Networks for Classification of Natural Language-based Non-functional Requirements..7 indexed citations
Chatterjee, Sutirtha, Gregory D. Moody, Paul Benjamin Lowry, Suranjan Chakraborty, & Andrew Hardin. (2015). Strategic Relevance of Organizational Virtues Enabled by Information Technology in Organizational Innovation. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
8.
Chakraborty, Suranjan, Sutirtha Chatterjee, & Deema Mohammed Alsekait. (2015). Investigating System Development Processes in Healthcare Organizations. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1.1 indexed citations
9.
Chakraborty, Suranjan, Christoph Rosenkranz, & Josh Dehlinger. (2015). Getting to the Shalls. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems. 5(3). 1–30.7 indexed citations
Lazar, Jonathan, et al.. (2013). Development and evaluation of two prototypes for providing weather map data to blind users through sonification. Journal of Usability Studies archive. 8(4). 93–110.6 indexed citations
12.
Chakraborty, Suranjan, Christoph Rosenkranz, & Josh Dehlinger. (2012). A Grounded Theoretical and Linguistic Analysis Approach for Non-Functional Requirements Analysis. International Conference on Information Systems.4 indexed citations
13.
Chatterjee, Sutirtha, Suranjan Chakraborty, & Suprateek Sarker. (2011). The Strategic Relevance of IT-enabled Organizational Virtues. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.1 indexed citations
14.
Hasan, Raza & Suranjan Chakraborty. (2011). Investigating Software Maintenance Challenges in Small Organizations. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.1 indexed citations
15.
Meiselwitz, Gabriele & Suranjan Chakraborty. (2011). Exploring the Connection between Age and Strategies for Learning new Technology Related Tasks. Information Systems Education Journal. 9(4). 55–62.3 indexed citations
16.
Chakraborty, Suranjan, et al.. (2010). UNDERSTANDING THE ROLE OF INFERENTIAL REASONING IN THE REQUIREMENTS ELICITATION PROCESS. CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School). 262.1 indexed citations
Chakraborty, Suranjan, Saonee Sarker, & Joseph S. Valacich. (2007). Understanding analyst effectiveness in requirements elicitation: A gestalt fit perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 771–782.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.