Subir Sarker

2.3k citations
131 papers · 1.6k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Subir Sarker

115 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Subir Sarker
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Animal Science and Zoology 769
  • Virology 261
  • Infectious Diseases 440
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 236
  • Parasitology 112
Replace Ana Cláudia Franco with:
Ana Cláudia Franco Brazil
Hsiang‐Jung Tsai Taiwan
Chrysostomos Ι. Dovas Greece
Parimal Roy India
Tongling Shan China
Francesco Cirone Italy
Arnab Sen India
Hüseyin Yılmaz Türkiye
Masami Mochizuki Japan
Sanjie Cao China
Subir Sarker relative to Ana Cláudia Franco Brazil Ana Cláudia Franco's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Ana Cláudia Franco · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Subir Sarker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Subir Sarker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Subir Sarker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Subir Sarker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Subir Sarker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Subir Sarker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Subir Sarker. The network helps show where Subir Sarker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Subir Sarker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Subir Sarker Line = papers co-authored together Subir Sarker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 131 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202093
2 201463
3 201457
4 202357
5 201455
6 201553
7 201652
8 201950
9 201550
10 201749
11 201148
12 201446
13 201538
14 202138
15 201736
16 201232
17 201829
18 201928
19 202126
20 201625

About Subir Sarker

Subir Sarker is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Epidemiology, Genetics, Plant Science and Infectious Diseases, having authored 131 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Virus Infections Studies (55 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (34 papers), Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments (27 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (23 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (18 papers), Viral Infections and Vectors (17 papers), Poxvirus research and outbreaks (17 papers) and Virology and Viral Diseases (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (769 citations), Virology (261 citations), Infectious Diseases (440 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (236 citations) and Parasitology (112 citations). Subir Sarker has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Bangladesh and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Shane Raidal, Jade K. Forwood, Seyed A. Ghorashi, Andrew Peters, Karla J. Helbig, Shubhagata Das, Md. Hakimul Haque, G. Barry Baker, Mark Holdsworth and Edward I. Patterson. Their work appears in journals such as Viruses, Virology, Australian Veterinary Journal, Scientific Reports and Veterinary Microbiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact