Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Make — a program for maintaining computer programs
1979512 citationsStuart I. FeldmanSoftware Practice and Experienceprofile →
Political polarization of news media and influencers on Twitter in the 2016 and 2020 US presidential elections
202365 citationsAlessandro Galeazzi, Stuart I. Feldman et al.Nature Human Behaviourprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Stuart I. Feldman
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart I. Feldman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart I. Feldman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart I. Feldman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart I. Feldman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart I. Feldman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart I. Feldman. The network helps show where Stuart I. Feldman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stuart I. Feldman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stuart I. Feldman.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stuart I. Feldman based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Stuart I. Feldman. Stuart I. Feldman is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Galeazzi, Alessandro, Stuart I. Feldman, Michael W. Macy, et al.. (2023). Political polarization of news media and influencers on Twitter in the 2016 and 2020 US presidential elections. Nature Human Behaviour. 7(6). 904–916.65 indexed citations breakdown →
2.
Petrov, Georgi I., et al.. (2021). Mars Manufacturing Settlement. ThinkTech (Texas Tech University).1 indexed citations
3.
Kushida, Kenji E., et al.. (2013). Services with Everything: The ICT-Enabled Digital Tranformation of Services.5 indexed citations
Feldman, Stuart I., et al.. (2004). Proceedings of the 13th international World Wide Web conference on Alternate track papers & posters.47 indexed citations
10.
Feldman, Stuart I., et al.. (2004). Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web.27 indexed citations
Ferguson, Donald, Jakka Sairamesh, & Stuart I. Feldman. (2004). Open frameworks for information cities. Communications of the ACM. 47(2). 45–49.17 indexed citations
13.
Feldman, Stuart I.. (2000). E-Business: Electronic Marketplaces.. IEEE Internet Computing. 4. 93–95.3 indexed citations
Feldman, Stuart I.. (1979). Make — a program for maintaining computer programs. Software Practice and Experience. 9(4). 255–265.512 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.