Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Patterns of pelvic recurrence following definitive resections of rectal cancer
1984423 citationsStuart H. Q. Quan, Stephen S. Sternberg et al.Cancerprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Stuart H. Q. Quan
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart H. Q. Quan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart H. Q. Quan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart H. Q. Quan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart H. Q. Quan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart H. Q. Quan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart H. Q. Quan. The network helps show where Stuart H. Q. Quan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stuart H. Q. Quan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stuart H. Q. Quan.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stuart H. Q. Quan based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Stuart H. Q. Quan. Stuart H. Q. Quan is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Sauven, P, John A. Ridge, Stuart H. Q. Quan, & Elin R. Sigurdson. (1990). Anorectal Carcinoid Tumors. Annals of Surgery. 211(1). 67–71.71 indexed citations
Greenall, Michael J., Stuart H. Q. Quan, Maus W. Stearns, Carlos Urmacher, & Jerome J. DeCosse. (1985). Epidermoid cancer of the anal margin. The American Journal of Surgery. 149(1). 95–101.91 indexed citations
9.
Greenall, Michael J., Stuart H. Q. Quan, & Jerome J. DeCosse. (1985). Epidermoid cancer of the anus. British journal of surgery. 72(Supplement_1). s97–s103.32 indexed citations
10.
Wanebo, Harold J., James M. Woodruff, Gist H. Farr, & Stuart H. Q. Quan. (1981). Anorectal melanoma. Cancer. 47(7). 1891–1900.160 indexed citations
11.
Quan, Stuart H. Q.. (1978). Anal and Para-Anal Tumors. Surgical Clinics of North America. 58(3). 591–603.29 indexed citations
12.
Harvey, James C., Stuart H. Q. Quan, & Maus W. Stearns. (1978). Management of familial polyposis with preservation of the rectum.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 84(4). 476–82.21 indexed citations
Nelson, Robert S., et al.. (1971). Carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 14(2). 81–107.4 indexed citations
16.
Quan, Stuart H. Q. & El B. Castro. (1971). Papillary adenomas (villous tumors):. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 14(4). 267–280.37 indexed citations
17.
Quan, Stuart H. Q.. (1966). PREOPERATIVE RADIATION FOR CARCINOMA OF RECTUM.. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 24(4). 442–3.6 indexed citations
18.
Stearns, Maus W., et al.. (1966). Malignant anal lesions. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 9(5). 315–327.14 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.