Stuart C. Porter

880 total citations
22 papers, 563 citations indexed

About

Stuart C. Porter is a scholar working on Pharmaceutical Science, Organic Chemistry and Computer Networks and Communications. According to data from OpenAlex, Stuart C. Porter has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 563 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Pharmaceutical Science, 4 papers in Organic Chemistry and 3 papers in Computer Networks and Communications. Recurrent topics in Stuart C. Porter's work include Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (12 papers), Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (6 papers) and Caching and Content Delivery (3 papers). Stuart C. Porter is often cited by papers focused on Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (12 papers), Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (6 papers) and Caching and Content Delivery (3 papers). Stuart C. Porter collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Stuart C. Porter's co-authors include Linda A. Felton, K Ridgway, Bhagwan D. Rohera, C. T. Rhodes, Gurvinder Singh Rekhi, Joseph B. Schwartz, Sunil S. Jambhekar, Rodney J. Wigent, Roger L. Schnaare and Axel Meisen and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Pharmaceutics, Pharmaceutical Research and Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology.

In The Last Decade

Stuart C. Porter

21 papers receiving 536 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stuart C. Porter United States 14 306 87 73 62 57 22 563
Marina Levina United Kingdom 17 427 1.4× 111 1.3× 72 1.0× 75 1.2× 100 1.8× 23 624
Susanne Muschert France 14 305 1.0× 102 1.2× 87 1.2× 87 1.4× 77 1.4× 25 521
Karen Mitchell United Kingdom 10 464 1.5× 128 1.5× 80 1.1× 65 1.0× 100 1.8× 12 612
Omar Sprockel United States 17 451 1.5× 107 1.2× 71 1.0× 57 0.9× 76 1.3× 31 688
J I Wells United Kingdom 11 261 0.9× 80 0.9× 35 0.5× 50 0.8× 91 1.6× 19 521
Tahmer Sharkawi France 16 234 0.8× 64 0.7× 87 1.2× 124 2.0× 86 1.5× 33 534
Justin M. Keen United States 14 480 1.6× 85 1.0× 100 1.4× 62 1.0× 79 1.4× 17 655
János Bajdik Hungary 12 205 0.7× 42 0.5× 47 0.6× 119 1.9× 57 1.0× 32 393
Hiroyasu Kokubo Japan 11 252 0.8× 45 0.5× 34 0.5× 46 0.7× 59 1.0× 18 395
Michael Leane United Kingdom 12 380 1.2× 85 1.0× 95 1.3× 68 1.1× 90 1.6× 18 726

Countries citing papers authored by Stuart C. Porter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart C. Porter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart C. Porter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart C. Porter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart C. Porter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart C. Porter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart C. Porter. The network helps show where Stuart C. Porter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stuart C. Porter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stuart C. Porter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stuart C. Porter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stuart C. Porter. Stuart C. Porter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Porter, Stuart C., et al.. (2022). Application of Mathematical Models to Determine the Feasibility of Amorphous Drug Layering in Pan Coaters. Pharmaceutics. 14(1). 149–149. 1 indexed citations
2.
Porter, Stuart C., et al.. (2021). Interrelationships Between Coating Uniformity and Efficiency in Pan Coating Processes. AAPS PharmSciTech. 22(8). 265–265. 8 indexed citations
3.
Porter, Stuart C., et al.. (2020). Novel Coating Uniformity Models for Tablet Pan Coaters. AAPS PharmSciTech. 22(1). 6 indexed citations
4.
Phinikarides, Alexander, et al.. (2018). Improving video QoE with IP over ICN. International Journal of Network Management. 30(3). 1 indexed citations
5.
Niblett, Daniel, et al.. (2017). Development and evaluation of a dimensionless mechanistic pan coating model for the prediction of coated tablet appearance. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 528(1-2). 180–201. 21 indexed citations
6.
Keen, Justin M., et al.. (2015). Investigation of the interactions of enteric and hydrophilic polymers to enhance dissolution of griseofulvin following hot melt extrusion processing. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 67(7). 918–938. 18 indexed citations
7.
Felton, Linda A. & Stuart C. Porter. (2013). An update on pharmaceutical film coating for drug delivery. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery. 10(4). 421–435. 79 indexed citations
8.
Trossen, Dirk, et al.. (2013). Realising an application environment for information-centric networking. Computer Networks. 57(16). 3249–3266. 6 indexed citations
9.
Porter, Stuart C. & Linda A. Felton. (2010). Techniques to assess film coatings and evaluate film-coated products. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy. 36(2). 128–142. 45 indexed citations
10.
Schwartz, Joseph B., et al.. (2000). Drug Release from Film-Coated Chlorpheniramine Maleate Nonpareil Beads: Effect of Water-Soluble Polymer, Coating Level, and Soluble Core Material. Pharmaceutical Development and Technology. 5(3). 383–390. 33 indexed citations
11.
Rhodes, C. T. & Stuart C. Porter. (1998). Coatings for Controlled-Release Drug Delivery Systems. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy. 24(12). 1139–1154. 37 indexed citations
12.
Porter, Stuart C., et al.. (1997). Process Optimization Using Design of Experiments. 21(10). 60–70. 37 indexed citations
13.
Rekhi, Gurvinder Singh, Stuart C. Porter, & Sunil S. Jambhekar. (1995). Factors Affecting the Release of Propranolol Hydrochloride from Beads Coated with Aqueous Polymeric Dispersions. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy. 21(6). 709–729. 26 indexed citations
14.
Porter, Stuart C., et al.. (1993). Tensile Properties of Free Films Cast from Aqueous Ethylcellulose Dispersions. Pharmaceutical Research. 10(6). 810–815. 30 indexed citations
15.
Porter, Stuart C., et al.. (1993). Aqueous Ethylcellulose Dispersion of Ethylcellulose. I. Evaluation of Coating Process Variables. Pharmaceutical Research. 10(4). 525–534. 37 indexed citations
16.
Klinger, George, et al.. (1990). Formulation of Controlled Release Matrices by Granulation with a Polymer Dispersion. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy. 16(9). 1473–1490. 9 indexed citations
17.
Porter, Stuart C.. (1989). Controlled-Release Film Coatings Based on Ethylcellulose. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy. 15(10). 1495–1521. 94 indexed citations
18.
Porter, Stuart C. & K Ridgway. (1983). An evaluation of the properties of enteric coating polymers: measurement of glass transition temperature. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 35(6). 341–344. 22 indexed citations
19.
Porter, Stuart C. & K Ridgway. (1982). The permeability of enteric coatings and the dissolution rates of coated tablets. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 34(1). 5–8. 33 indexed citations
20.
Porter, Stuart C. & K Ridgway. (1977). The Properties of Enteric Tablet Coatings Made from Polyvinyl Acetate-Phthalate and Cellulose Acetate-Phthalate. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 29(Supplement_1). 42P–42P. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026