Stig Ramel

3.2k total citations · 2 hit papers
32 papers, 2.4k citations indexed

About

Stig Ramel is a scholar working on Surgery, Gastroenterology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Stig Ramel has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 2.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Surgery, 8 papers in Gastroenterology and 6 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Stig Ramel's work include Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (7 papers), Hernia repair and management (6 papers) and Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (5 papers). Stig Ramel is often cited by papers focused on Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (7 papers), Hernia repair and management (6 papers) and Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (5 papers). Stig Ramel collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, United States and Finland. Stig Ramel's co-authors include Carissa A. Sanchez, Brian J. Reid, Wendy H. Raskind, Riitta Ylitalo, Catherine Morgan, Rejean L. Idzerda, Sven Bringman, B Anderberg, Gunnar Ahlberg and Lars Enochsson and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Gastroenterology and Annals of Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Stig Ramel

30 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Hit Papers

A p53-Dependent Mouse Spindle Checkpoint 1995 2026 2005 2015 1995 2007 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stig Ramel Sweden 18 1.3k 573 530 450 380 32 2.4k
Guy Hubens Belgium 27 1.5k 1.1× 635 1.1× 586 1.1× 508 1.1× 231 0.6× 120 3.1k
Hendrik Reynaert Belgium 28 880 0.7× 180 0.3× 449 0.8× 237 0.5× 237 0.6× 111 3.0k
Shigekazu Hidaka Japan 27 1.0k 0.8× 899 1.6× 404 0.8× 651 1.4× 161 0.4× 180 2.6k
George Gallagher United States 26 621 0.5× 448 0.8× 459 0.9× 277 0.6× 289 0.8× 78 2.0k
David M. Melville United States 20 1.1k 0.8× 566 1.0× 158 0.3× 212 0.5× 82 0.2× 49 2.2k
Cor G. M. I. Baeten Netherlands 40 3.9k 2.9× 750 1.3× 251 0.5× 162 0.4× 93 0.2× 118 4.9k
Jeanne E. Hicks United States 24 446 0.3× 413 0.7× 406 0.8× 293 0.7× 51 0.1× 35 2.5k
Victor E. Pricolo United States 28 1.0k 0.7× 731 1.3× 361 0.7× 406 0.9× 98 0.3× 78 2.2k
Junichi Tanaka Japan 19 491 0.4× 496 0.9× 328 0.6× 242 0.5× 157 0.4× 114 1.4k
Didier Dequanter Belgium 23 509 0.4× 267 0.5× 233 0.4× 604 1.3× 212 0.6× 102 1.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Stig Ramel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stig Ramel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stig Ramel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stig Ramel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stig Ramel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stig Ramel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stig Ramel. The network helps show where Stig Ramel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stig Ramel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stig Ramel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stig Ramel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stig Ramel. Stig Ramel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Roguedas‐Contios, Anne‐Marie, et al.. (2010). Frequency of aquagenic palmoplantar keratoderma in cystic fibrosis: a new sign of cystic fibrosis?. British Journal of Dermatology. 163(1). 162–166. 38 indexed citations
4.
Ahlberg, Gunnar, Lars Enochsson, Anthony G. Gallagher, et al.. (2007). Proficiency-based virtual reality training significantly reduces the error rate for residents during their first 10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. The American Journal of Surgery. 193(6). 797–804. 496 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Smedberg, Sam, Stig Ramel, Sven Bringman, et al.. (2004). Early results of a single-blinded, randomized, controlled, Internet-based multicenter trial comparing Prolene and Vypro�II mesh in Lichtenstein hernioplasty. Hernia. 8(2). 127–134. 38 indexed citations
6.
Ylitalo, Riitta, et al.. (2004). Prevalence of Extraesophageal Reflux in Patients with Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux. Otolaryngology. 131(1). 29–33. 16 indexed citations
7.
Bringman, Sven, et al.. (2003). Tension-Free Inguinal Hernia Repair: TEP Versus Mesh-Plug Versus Lichtenstein. Annals of Surgery. 237(1). 142–147. 166 indexed citations
8.
Andersson, Lena, Gunnar Lindberg, Sven Bringman, et al.. (2003). Pneumoperitoneum versus abdominal wall lift: effects on central haemodynamics and intrathoracic pressure during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 47(7). 838–846. 108 indexed citations
9.
Ramel, Stig. (2003). Barrett’s Esophagus: Model of Neoplastic Progression. World Journal of Surgery. 27(9). 1009–1013. 4 indexed citations
10.
Bringman, Sven, Åsa Ek, Eva Haglind, et al.. (2001). Is a Dissection Balloon Beneficial in Bilateral, Totally Extraperitoneal, Endoscopic Hernioplasty? A Randomized, Prospective, Multicenter Study. Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques. 11(5). 322–326. 11 indexed citations
11.
Bringman, Sven, Åsa Ek, E. Haglind, et al.. (2001). Is a dissection balloon beneficial in totally extraperitoneal endoscopic hernioplasty (TEP)?. Surgical Endoscopy. 15(3). 266–270. 42 indexed citations
12.
Ylitalo, Riitta, Per‐Åke Lindestad, & Stig Ramel. (2001). Symptoms, Laryngeal Findings, and 24‐Hour pH Monitoring in Patients With Suspected Gastroesophago‐Pharyngeal Reflux. The Laryngoscope. 111(10). 1735–1741. 101 indexed citations
13.
Ylitalo, Riitta, Per‐Åke Lindestad, & Stig Ramel. (2001). Symptoms, laryngeal findings and 24-hour 2-site pH monitoring in patients with suspected gastroesophago-pharyngeal reflux. Gastroenterology. 120(5). A426–A426. 3 indexed citations
14.
Heikkinen, T., et al.. (2000). Comparison of laparoscopic and open Nissen fundoplication 2 years after operationrid="". Surgical Endoscopy. 14(11). 1019–1023. 78 indexed citations
15.
Barle, H., Björn Nyberg, Stig Ramel, et al.. (1999). Inhibition of liver protein synthesis during laparoscopic surgery. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism. 277(4). E591–E596. 16 indexed citations
16.
Kjellin, A., Stig Ramel, S Rössner, & K Thor. (1996). Gastroesophageal Reflux in Obese Patients Is Not Reduced by Weight Reduction. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. 31(11). 1047–1051. 125 indexed citations
17.
Ramel, Stig, et al.. (1995). Inactivation of p53 and the Development of Tetraploidy in the Elastase-SV40 T Antigen Transgenic Mouse Pancreas. Pancreas. 11(3). 213–222. 31 indexed citations
18.
Neshat, Katayoun, Carissa A. Sanchez, Patricia C. Galipeau, et al.. (1994). Barrett's Esophagus: A Model of Human Neoplastic Progression. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. 59(0). 577–583. 38 indexed citations
19.
Lindham, S. & Stig Ramel. (1987). A Retrospective Study of 91 Cases with Gastroschisis or Omphalocele 1956-1985. European Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 42(6). 366–370. 5 indexed citations
20.
Ramel, Stig, et al.. (1983). The legacy of Alfred Nobel: the story behind the Nobel prizes. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026