Steven R. Krebaum
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 5%
- Biological Psychiatry top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Bryon AdinoffMark J. WilliamsAli IranmaneshMorton B. BrownWen YePatricia ChandlerJeffrey R. VittenglRobin B. Jarrett
- Topics
- Stress Responses and Cortisol (3 papers)Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency (2 papers)Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Affective DisordersAlcoholism Clinical and Experimental ResearchThe American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Steven R. Krebaum
5 papers receiving 315 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Behavioral Neuroscience 170
- Biological Psychiatry 80
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 71
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 61
- Cognitive Neuroscience 47
Countries citing papers authored by Steven R. Krebaum
This map shows the geographic impact of Steven R. Krebaum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven R. Krebaum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven R. Krebaum more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Steven R. Krebaum
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven R. Krebaum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven R. Krebaum. The network helps show where Steven R. Krebaum may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steven R. Krebaum
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steven R. Krebaum. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steven R. Krebaum based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Steven R. Krebaum. Steven R. Krebaum is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | |
| 2 | 84 | |
| 3 | [The relationship between the craving for alcohol and relapse of the disease]. | 0 |
| 4 | 63 | |
| 5 | 57 | |
| 6 | 108 |
About Steven R. Krebaum
Steven R. Krebaum is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Biological Psychiatry and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 325 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stress Responses and Cortisol (3 papers), Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency (2 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (170 citations), Biological Psychiatry (80 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (71 citations). Steven R. Krebaum has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Bryon Adinoff, Mark J. Williams, Ali Iranmanesh, Morton B. Brown, Wen Ye, Patricia Chandler, Jeffrey R. Vittengl, Robin B. Jarrett, Daniel J. Taylor and Heather Walters. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Affective Disorders, Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research and The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.